On 8/10/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/10/06, Butash, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reposting to the User list...
Thanks
Bob,
Ive been doing a bit of archeology on AbstractJsfBaseClass.java.
Of course, that is supposed to be AbstractJsfTestCase.java.
Craig
which I can not do at the moment due to the current
difference in method signatures.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig
McClanahan
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 12:03 PM
To: user@shale.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: Shale Test
On 8/10/06, Butash, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig,
Correct the AbstractJsfTestCase .java has never thrown Exception from
the setup and tearDown methods. But JUnit's TestCase, which is the
super class does throw Exceptions from these methods. The
AbstractJsfTestCase is altering the
@shale.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: Shale Test - Exceptions
On 8/10/06, Butash, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig,
Correct the AbstractJsfTestCase .java has never thrown Exception from
the setup and tearDown methods. But JUnit's TestCase, which is the
super class does throw Exceptions from
