Re: Latency experiment without losing executors

2016-05-19 Thread Ted Yu
://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Latency-experiment-without-losing-executors-td26981.html > > Also, attached is the executor logs.​ > spark-logging.log > <https://drive.google.com/a/hawk.iit.edu/file/d/0B6naIKwXOhAUVjNLSTlkTGhnM3c/view?usp=drive_web> > ​ > >

Re: Latency experiment without losing executors

2016-05-19 Thread Geet Kumar
Ah, it seems the code did not show up in the email. Here is a link to the original post: http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Latency-experiment-without-losing-executors-td26981.html Also, attached is the executor logs.​ spark-logging.log <https://drive.google.com/a/hawk.iit.

Re: Latency experiment without losing executors

2016-05-19 Thread Ted Yu
ed executors, would be much appreciated. > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Latency-experiment-without-losing-executors-tp26981.html > Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at N

Latency experiment without losing executors

2016-05-18 Thread gkumar7
, would be much appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Latency-experiment-without-losing-executors-tp26981.html Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com