Thanks Bryan for that pointer : I will follow it. In the meantime the One
vs Rest appears to satisfy the requirements.
2016-05-29 15:40 GMT-07:00 Bryan Cutler :
> This is currently being worked on, planned for 2.1 I believe
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7159
>
This is currently being worked on, planned for 2.1 I believe
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7159
On May 28, 2016 9:31 PM, "Stephen Boesch" wrote:
> Thanks Phuong But the point of my post is how to achieve without using
> the deprecated the mllib pacakge. The
Thanks Phuong But the point of my post is how to achieve without using the
deprecated the mllib pacakge. The mllib package already has multinomial
regression built in
2016-05-28 21:19 GMT-07:00 Phuong LE-HONG :
> Dear Stephen,
>
> Yes, you're right, LogisticGradient is in
Dear Stephen,
Yes, you're right, LogisticGradient is in the mllib package, not ml
package. I just want to say that we can build a multinomial logistic
regression model from the current version of Spark.
Regards,
Phuong
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:04 AM, Stephen Boesch
Hi Phuong,
The LogisticGradient exists in the mllib but not ml package. The
LogisticRegression chooses either the breeze LBFGS - if L2 only (not
elastic net) and no regularization or the Orthant Wise Quasi Newton (OWLQN)
otherwise: it does not appear to choose GD in either scenario.
If I have
Dear Stephen,
The Logistic Regression currently supports only binary regression.
However, the LogisticGradient does support computing gradient and loss
for a multinomial logistic regression. That is, you can train a
multinomial logistic regression model with LogisticGradient and a
class to solve
Followup: just encountered the "OneVsRest" classifier in
ml.classsification: I will look into using it with the binary
LogisticRegression as the provided classifier.
2016-05-28 9:06 GMT-07:00 Stephen Boesch :
>
> Presently only the mllib version has the one-vs-all approach
Presently only the mllib version has the one-vs-all approach for
multinomial support. The ml version with ElasticNet support only allows
binary regression.
With feature parity of ml vs mllib having been stated as an objective for
2.0.0 - is there a projected availability of the multinomial