Re: Effects problems in logistic regression

2014-12-22 Thread DB Tsai
n DB Tsai, LogisticRegressionWithLBFGS works for me! > > > > *De:* Franco Barrientos [mailto:franco.barrien...@exalitica.com] > *Enviado el:* jueves, 18 de diciembre de 2014 16:42 > *Para:* 'DB Tsai' > *CC:* 'Sean Owen'; user@spark.apache.org > *Asunto:* RE: Effects

RE: Effects problems in logistic regression

2014-12-22 Thread Franco Barrientos
Thanks again DB Tsai, LogisticRegressionWithLBFGS works for me! De: Franco Barrientos [mailto:franco.barrien...@exalitica.com] Enviado el: jueves, 18 de diciembre de 2014 16:42 Para: 'DB Tsai' CC: 'Sean Owen'; user@spark.apache.org Asunto: RE: Effects problems in

RE: Effects problems in logistic regression

2014-12-18 Thread Franco Barrientos
Thanks I will try. De: DB Tsai [mailto:dbt...@dbtsai.com] Enviado el: jueves, 18 de diciembre de 2014 16:24 Para: Franco Barrientos CC: Sean Owen; user@spark.apache.org Asunto: Re: Effects problems in logistic regression Can you try LogisticRegressionWithLBFGS? I verified that this will

Re: Effects problems in logistic regression

2014-12-18 Thread DB Tsai
es, 18 de diciembre de 2014 14:22 > *Para:* Franco Barrientos > *CC:* user@spark.apache.org > *Asunto:* Re: Effects problems in logistic regression > > > > Are you sure this is an apples-to-apples comparison? for example does your > SAS process normalize or otherwise transfor

RE: Effects problems in logistic regression

2014-12-18 Thread Franco Barrientos
Yes, without the “amounts” variables the results are similiar. When I put other variables its fine. De: Sean Owen [mailto:so...@cloudera.com] Enviado el: jueves, 18 de diciembre de 2014 14:22 Para: Franco Barrientos CC: user@spark.apache.org Asunto: Re: Effects problems in logistic

Re: Effects problems in logistic regression

2014-12-18 Thread Sean Owen
Are you sure this is an apples-to-apples comparison? for example does your SAS process normalize or otherwise transform the data first? Is the optimization configured similarly in both cases -- same regularization, etc.? Are you sure you are pulling out the intercept correctly? It is a separate v