But I am able to run the SparkPi example:
./run-example SparkPi 1000 --master spark://192.168.26.131:7077
Result:Pi is roughly 3.14173708
bit1...@163.com
From: bit1...@163.com
Date: 2015-02-18 16:29
To: user
Subject: Problem with 1 master + 2 slaves cluster
Hi sparkers,
I setup a spark(1.2.1)
Since the cluster is standalone, you are better off reading/writing to hdfs
instead of local filesystem.
Thanks
Best Regards
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:32 PM, bit1...@163.com wrote:
> But I am able to run the SparkPi example:
> ./run-example SparkPi 1000 --master spark://192.168.26.131:7077
>
>
Sure, thanks Akhil.
A further question : Is local file system(file:///) not supported in standalone
cluster?
bit1...@163.com
From: Akhil Das
Date: 2015-02-18 17:35
To: bit1...@163.com
CC: user
Subject: Re: Problem with 1 master + 2 slaves cluster
Since the cluster is standalone, you are
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:23 AM, bit1...@163.com wrote:
> Sure, thanks Akhil.
> A further question : Is local file system(file:///) not supported in
> standalone cluster?
>
FYI: I'm able to write to local file system (via HDFS API and using
file:/// notation) when using Spark.
--
Emre Sevinç
when you give file:// , while reading, it requires that all slaves has that
path/file available locally in their system. It's ok to give file:// when
you run your application in local mode (like master=local[*])
Thanks
Best Regards
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Emre Sevinc wrote:
> On Wed, F
