Should I take it from the lack of replies that the --ebs-vol-size feature
doesn't work?
-Ben
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Trouble-with-spark-ec2-script-ebs-vol-size-tp9619p9934.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archiv
please add
From: "Ben Horner [via Apache Spark User List]"
mailto:ml-node+s1001560n9934...@n3.nabble.com>>
Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 at 8:47 AM
To: Ben Horner mailto:ben.hor...@atigeo.com>>
Subject: Re: Trouble with spark-ec2 script: --ebs-vol-size
Should I take it fr
email]
> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=9935&i=0>>
> Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 at 8:47 AM
> To: Ben Horner <[hidden email]
> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=9935&i=1>>
> Subject: Re: Trouble with spark-ec2 script: --ebs-vol-s
I've just tried it again, with the same results.
When you say "it worked" what does the NameNode page list as your
"Configured Capacity"?
For me, (apparently) regardless of what I specify in the --ebs-vol-size
parameter, I get a persistent HDFS capacity of 31.5 GB.
I also used df -h to see what d
