Hello,
Problem is:
- Started (storm jar ...) DRPC topology with ShellBolt (PHP) (ver
9.3.0-rc1)
- After being started it works ok for us
- After being killed there is a garbage left somewhere according logs
(see logs below)
What can it be? In what direction should i continue my investigat
@Nathan: :) thanks for the quality comparison. Nice bottom line for a
presentaton/conclusion.
@all: thank you for your help. Awesome support in this community.
> Am 17.11.2014 um 07:58 schrieb Vladi Feigin :
>
> Nathan,
>
> Liked ! <>
>
>
>> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Nathan Leun
Nathan,
Liked ! <>
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Nathan Leung wrote:
> Also it supports cycles in the graph. It's like comparing a bicycle to an
> airplane.
> On Nov 16, 2014 2:03 PM, "Vladi Feigin" wrote:
>
>> Storm is much more sophisticated then just filter-pipe pattern.
>> It provide
I'm trying to shutdown a long running bolt (based on the sample
ExclamationBolt) but it seems the cluster.killTopology() call is only
interrupting one task and continuing to execute other tasks. To simplify
things I am only running one bolt in the topology. This is the bolt code I
am running (local
Also it supports cycles in the graph. It's like comparing a bicycle to an
airplane.
On Nov 16, 2014 2:03 PM, "Vladi Feigin" wrote:
> Storm is much more sophisticated then just filter-pipe pattern.
> It provides
> 1. Reliability: guarantees that every spout tuple will be fully
> processed. Actuall
Storm is much more sophisticated then just filter-pipe pattern.
It provides
1. Reliability: guarantees that every spout tuple will be fully processed.
Actually it provides : at-most-once delivery(no ackers) , at-least-once
delivery(ackers) and exactly-once (Trident) semantic for the message
deliv
So basically Storm’s core concept can be compared to pipes-and-filters-pattern
BUT provides a more „user-friendly“ framework than e.g. a unix based
pipes-and-filters processing.
btw: I haven’t come across with TRIDENT yet. Just starting to dive deeper into
Storm as a potential technology for a
Hi,
We have recently started facing an issue due to an upgrade to Clojure 1.6
for one of the component that we are using with the condition of aot being
enabled. We can still workaround without aot and let it compile with
Clojure 1.5 but Storm being able to run with Clojure 1.6 is what we are
inte
Hello all,
In the Storm UI if I navigate to the page for a particular bolt there is a
section at the bottom that shows errors associated with the bolt. The
timestamps shown for the error messages are of a form like this:
Fri, 07 Nov 2014 19:53:55 +
The errors are displayed in sorted form,
hi,
It's matter of fine tuning and depends on your topology , there is no one
gold number. Start from 1K , monitor it. If you see that your topology
supports higher throughput , increase it ... or if it's not, decrease it..
Vladi
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Nilesh Chhapru <
nilesh.chha...
10 matches
Mail list logo