RE: Storm Topology Hanging

2016-04-10 Thread Nitin Gupta
user@storm.apache.org Subject: RE: Storm Topology Hanging Hi Nitin, You might get problems with max spout pending if you delay acking of one message until another arrives. In this case having a low max spout pending can cause the buffers to fill before the awaited message arrives. But this type of dead

RE: Storm Topology Hanging

2016-04-07 Thread Alexander T
Wednesday, April 06, 2016 1:30 PM > *To:* user@storm.apache.org > *Subject:* RE: Storm Topology Hanging > > > > Thanks for the response! > > > > · The Storm version is 0.9.4 > > · I have set a message timeout to 300 seconds. > > · Yes

Re: Storm Topology Hanging

2016-04-07 Thread jinhong lu
Try to check the log of kafka at the moment topology began to hung, and the load of kafka cluster at that moment. I met a situation is that the kafka is too busy to response, it cause storm topology hung, especially when you use transactional topology. lujinhong > 在 2016年4月7日,13:58,Nitin Gupt

RE: Storm Topology Hanging

2016-04-06 Thread Nitin Gupta
To: user@storm.apache.org<mailto:user@storm.apache.org> Subject: Re: Storm Topology Hanging Hi Nitin, Though it decreases throughput when max spout pending value is small, it should not hang. Which version of Storm do you use, and could you share stack trace of workers if you don't

RE: Storm Topology Hanging

2016-04-06 Thread Nitin Gupta
@storm.apache.org Subject: Re: Storm Topology Hanging Hi Nitin, Though it decreases throughput when max spout pending value is small, it should not hang. Which version of Storm do you use, and could you share stack trace of workers if you don't mind? Btw, your spout latency is a bit high (10s).

Re: Storm Topology Hanging

2016-04-06 Thread Jungtaek Lim
Hi Nitin, Though it decreases throughput when max spout pending value is small, it should not hang. Which version of Storm do you use, and could you share stack trace of workers if you don't mind? Btw, your spout latency is a bit high (10s). Which value you set message timeout secs? Thanks, Jung