RE: Storm with RDBMS

2014-06-03 Thread Balakrishna R
: alex kamil [mailto:alex.ka...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 10:18 PM To: user@storm.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Storm with RDBMS for parallel reads of massive historical data and high volume writes you could you a distributed db with SQL layer such as Apache Hbase+Phoenix<h

Re: Storm with RDBMS

2014-06-02 Thread alex kamil
for parallel reads of massive historical data and high volume writes you could you a distributed db with SQL layer such as Apache Hbase+Phoenix , I think it might complement Storm nicely On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Nathan Leung wrote: > Something like

Re: Storm with RDBMS

2014-06-02 Thread Nathan Leung
Something like memcached is commonly used for this scenario. Is memcached poorly suited for your goals or data access patterns? On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Balakrishna R < balakrishn...@spanservices.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > We are evaluating ‘Apache storm’ for one of the business use cas

RE: Storm with RDBMS

2014-06-02 Thread Balakrishna R
Hi, We are evaluating 'Apache storm' for one of the business use cases. In this use case, the incoming transactions/stream should be processed by set of rules or logic. In this process, there is a need of considering the historical data (may be 2 weeks or a month old) also. Understand that, St