If you just need access to the parameters from the action, you can use:
String resource =
invocation.getProxy().getConfig().getParams().get("AuthoritationInterceptor.resource");
I've used this several times to get parameters from the configuration, but I
usually put the parameters on the action i
I know that the inteceptor knows which action is invoked. I just don't want
it to need to be aware of that. That's why I assigned a resource for each
action, using a parameter in the definition of the action:
[...]
Eco
MenuGestor
Ok, now it's definitively clear.
First every interceptor knows exactly which action is invoked through action
invocation.
With that said your action could implement (1) your custom interface or (2)
a generic Request Aware interface in order to retrieve request parameters.
Does this answer your ques
That was fast! The version is 2.1.8.1. I'm gonna try your suggestion right
now, and let you now.
Thanks
JL
2010/12/13 Steven Yang
> yes try adding "#" before "record" -> "#record"
>
> and since record is a map you can iterate through it directly without
> calling entrySet()
>
> On Tue, Dec 14,
yes try adding "#" before "record" -> "#record"
and since record is a map you can iterate through it directly without
calling entrySet()
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Dave Newton wrote:
> What version? Early versions sometimes required a "#" before the
> variable name when referencing vars
What version? Early versions sometimes required a "#" before the
variable name when referencing vars defined by things like an iterator
tag.
Dave
On Monday, December 13, 2010, JOSE L MARTINEZ-AVIAL wrote:
> Hello all, I'm trying to iterate through a List of Maps(I have a method
> "public List ge
Hello all, I'm trying to iterate through a List of Maps(I have a method
"public List getRecords()" in the action) using s:iterator. I can
iterate through the List without problems, but I can not get it to iterate
through the entries of the map. So far I've got this:
[..]
Hi Maurizio, Li,
Thanks for your suggestion, but the problem with the approaches you
suggested is that they link the security rules too much to the actions. We
want to be as abstract as possible. For that, we have developed the
following implementation:
We created some entities called Securi
I read the source of [simple/text.ftl], and found nothing
looks like rendering the extra [class="inputError"] attribute.
Can you tell me where it is?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional com
I did try that -- but unless simple/text.ftl changes, there will *still* be an
unwanted "class='inputError'" before my cssClass and cssErrorClass attributes
are handled by css.ftl. Your example produces the following broken tag:
It's closer -- but I believe that a change needs to be made in t
I read the source code of [simple/css.ftl],
it looks like trying to combine [cssClass] and [cssErrorClass].
So you can try:
<@s.textfield name="port" value=port key="service.port" maxsize="5"
cssClass="prop-port"
cssErrorClass="inputError"
/>
see if the result is what you want?
I think the tag-lib [/struts-tags] is defined in
[struts2-core-2.2.1.jar/META-INF/struts-tags.tld].
Can you see this file in your Eclipse, under the [Web App Libraries]?
Or, can you see the [Web App Libraries] in the [Java Build Path =>
Libraries] of your web-app?
Or, you can [refresh] your whol
I'm experimenting with Struts2 annotations and have some observations
that I'd like clarification on.
1) When using the convention plug-in the book "Apache Struts 2 Web
application Developement states" :
The plug-in will scan ... in Java packages whose names contain "struts",
"struts2", "action"
I'm experimenting with Struts2 annotations and have some observations
that I'd like clarification on.
1) When using the convention plug-in the book "Apache Struts 2 Web
application Developement states" :
The plug-in will scan ... in Java packages whose names contain "struts",
"struts2", "action"
My bad #1 is resolved...
I had left my jsp's in /WEB-INF/content not realizing that the java
package mypackage.struts2.otherpackage.MyAction
Didn't map to: /my but /otherpackage/my
The examples I'd seen had a package ending in "actions" and I'd made an
assumption.
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 15:37
I'm experimenting with Struts2 annotations and have some observations
that I'd like clarification on.
1) When using the convention plug-in the book "Apache Struts 2 Web
application Developement states" :
The plug-in will scan ... in Java packages whose names contain "struts",
"struts2", "action"
When a validation error occurs with the css_xhtml theme, the CSS class for a
form input does not have the correct class attributes, if a "cssClass" has been
supplied. Instead of class "inputError" joining the existing "class" which is
specified by the "cssClass" form tag attribute, two separat
We use the interceptor for interrogating a legacy database where we have
no control over the execution or timing of the query.
We basically have an API we call and then wait in hope.
I have to say that I've found the interceptor to be inconsistent at best.
For example we have some queries that a
Did you try to user annotation @TypeConversion ?
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Kapituła Javarsovia http://javarsovia.pl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional
TBF, it was a really old version of XWork. It was addressed and made more
complicated in the most recent version at the time I looked into it (still
not *fixed*, though ... everyone knows how to validate an email address
until they actually read the RFCs!).
-Brian
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:00
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Brian Thompson wrote:
> I've looked into this before. The email validator resolved down to some
> really old code in XWork with a regex that looked something like this:
>
> [a-z0-...@[a-z0-9].[a-z]^3
Thanks.. I hadn't looked at the source.. It looks like the API
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
> IIRC the default email validator isn't as robust as the page- long RFC email
> regex. I'd suggest either a patch, ora custom validator.
>
Thanks. I'll try to submit a patch after I get something more robust working
-
I've looked into this before. The email validator resolved down to some
really old code in XWork with a regex that looked something like this:
[a-z0-...@[a-z0-9].[a-z]^3
I strongly agree with Dave's advice. Broken email validators are too common
on the web.
-Brian
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:
IIRC the default email validator isn't as robust as the page- long RFC email
regex. I'd suggest either a patch, ora custom validator.
Dave
On Dec 13, 2010 12:11 PM, "Greg Akins" wrote:
> I just tried to use angrygreg+...@gmail.com as
an email , and the
> Struts EmailValidator doesn't like it (S
I just tried to use angrygreg+...@gmail.com as an email , and the
Struts EmailValidator doesn't like it (Struts 2.2.1)
I'm not that great at reading regexp.. it looks like maybe the regexp
should support that email address.. but I'm not sure.
Can anyone comment on whether EmailValidator is the be
Hi
I've just upgraded to 2.2.1 from 2.1.8 and I guess I must have missed a
piece of documentation somewhere. My IDE (Eclipse Helios) is now flagging
all my .jsp files as being in error. Specifically, it complains that it
cannot find the tag library descriptor "/struts-tags" (<%@ taglib prefix="s"
Thanks guys for your reponses, but I think I may have been unclear in
my question. I have a class called MyCurrencyConverter that converts
a string to a BigDecimal by stripping the "$", commas, etc. - this
works fine. The problem arises when struts does not call
MyCurrencyConverter for the nested
salesforce..peoplesoft..goldmine are crm packages that work as well
if you want to drive sales for your software why not find the limitations of
these other packages
and post how your software meets or exceeds the limitations inherent with each
package
Not a shill for peoplesoft..salesforce..go
28 matches
Mail list logo
