Re: @SMD annotation

2012-09-24 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Hi Salvatore, firstly I'm sorry for the late answer. Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on the point of view) I was not able to reproduce the behavior you described. I've been using the Struts Blank Web App [1] for my test (you can also download the Blank Web App from the download page [2]) I

Re: Type conversion on a Map

2012-09-24 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2012/9/21 Miguel Almeida : > Sure! > > Here's a maven project with a failing test case. > > There's actually a map being built, but it's a , and the key > reads "OGNL no conversion possible". Got it working, but I think the main problem is with key value - it isn't a simple string but an int that

Re: s:checkbox inside s:iterator in struts2.3.1.2

2012-09-24 Thread Omar Ngarigari
Hello, I changed my JSP page as per the documentation recommendation:   From: Lukasz Lenart To: Struts Users Mailing List ; Omar Ngarigari Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 12:50 AM Subject: Re: s:checkbox inside s:iterator in struts2.3.1.2 2012/9/24

Re: s:checkbox inside s:iterator in struts2.3.1.2

2012-09-24 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2012/9/24 Omar Ngarigari : > Hello, > > I changed my JSP page as per the documentation recommendation: > > > > > > And works ? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-un

Re: s:checkbox inside s:iterator in struts2.3.1.2

2012-09-24 Thread Omar Ngarigari
Hello, I changed my JSP page as per the documentation recommendation:   However. the error is still displaying. com.opensymphony.xwork2.ognl.OgnlValueStack] Error setting expression 'age' with value '[Ljava.lang.String;@1cf93cb': ognl.MethodFailedException: Method "setAge" failed for obj

Re: s:checkbox inside s:iterator in struts2.3.1.2

2012-09-24 Thread Omar Ngarigari
I figured it out. I think the correct way is to use fieldValue instead of value. It is working now. Thanks so much for your help. From: Lukasz Lenart To: Struts Users Mailing List ; Omar Ngarigari Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 2:08 PM Subject: Re: s:che