Re: [OT] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

This is getting tiresome, so I will try to be quick. I created another attachment (15777) to http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30292 . It is less compact that McGrady's version because it uses prefix not suffix, and event-to-method map. It actually was inspired by LookupDispatchActi

RE: [OT] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction There is no such thing as an "ad hominem attack" dear Dave. There are ad hominen arguments. Those are argument which attempt to draw a conclusion contrary to something someone adverts by challenging their character. I never have seen one of those on

Re: [OT] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

Dakota Jack wrote: I never have seen one of those on this list. *rotflmao* Curious. I _knew_ you didn't read your own posts; they were a bit too non-sensical. Are you SURE you're not just a poorly-written Markov chaining program? your response was one. LOL The irony is thick, huh?

Re: [OT] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

There is no such thing as an "ad hominem attack" dear Dave. There are ad hominen arguments. Those are argument which attempt to draw a conclusion contrary to something someone adverts by challenging their character. I never have seen one of those on this list. Oh, wait, your response was one. L

[OT] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

Dakota Jack wrote: Then there is Dave, dear sweet, but *awww* ever so odd, Dave, closer to Fig than Isaac. That much might be true; we have a fairly detailed family tree back to the very late 1500s and alas, Isaac does not seem to be on it. I am definitely odd, and I wake up happy abou

Re: [OT] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

Mmmh. Not always - at least, not in French right, for instance. If there is no license tied to code on a web site, but said code is clearly defined as Mr X's code, then it is implicit that you don't have the right to use it, integrate it, etc. for whatever purpose unless you have some written (1)

Re: [OT] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

On 7/25/05, Stéphane Zuckerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Craig McClanahan a écrit : > > On 7/21/05, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>This code does not belong to Michael. It is purloined from > >>www.michaelmcgrady.com and other > discussion

[OT] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

Craig McClanahan a écrit : On 7/21/05, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This code does not belong to Michael. It is purloined from www.michaelmcgrady.com and other discussion on this list. In the midst of chuckling at the assertions made in this thread, a serious comment for DJ (and o