> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Bill Keese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Dezember 2004 08:44
> An: Struts Users Mailing List
> Betreff: Re: [OT] Tomcat vs Resin
>
>
> >With lightweight pages resins performance is double of tomcat perfo
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Bill Keese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Dezember 2004 08:44
> An: Struts Users Mailing List
> Betreff: Re: [OT] Tomcat vs Resin
>
>
> >With lightweight pages resins performance is double of tomcat perfo
With lightweight pages resins performance is double of tomcat performance
(400 requests per second compared to aprox 200 requests per second)
I'm just curious. What is the bottleneck with serving pages? With 400
pages/sec is your CPU pegged at 100%? Or is there a disk bottleneck? I
read a re
Hi,
> 1) What do people think about Resin 3.x?
It's very cool, and development under resin is much easier, at least till
3.0.8 (haven't tried 3.0.9 and new performance packs yet)
> 2) I've seen quite a few people say that Resin is faster than Tomcat. Is
> this still true for Tomcat 5.x (not 5.5,
Hi,
> 1) What do people think about Resin 3.x?
It's very cool, and development under resin is much easier, at least till
3.0.8 (haven't tried 3.0.9 and new performance packs yet)
> 2) I've seen quite a few people say that Resin is faster than Tomcat. Is
> this still true for Tomcat 5.x (not 5.5,
Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.
1) What do people think about Resin 3.x?
2) I've seen quite a few people say that Resin is faster than Tomcat. Is
this still true for Tomcat 5.x (not 5.5, but the latest one still using JDK
1.4)?
3) In general, what do you feel about the differences betwe
6 matches
Mail list logo