Re: AW: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-30 Thread Larry Meadors
LOL! Based on the .net developers I have worked with so far, I concur. Example: The company I currently work for hired a ".NET Expert" to come help us get moving with our first .net project. On the first day, we were discussing data caching. .Net Expert: Put it in the asp.net cache object (like

Re: AW: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-30 Thread Leon Rosenberg
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 08:48 -0400, Ed Griebel wrote: > This is scary indeed. For Western NY, there's 2x .net jobs compared to > plain Java, and 8x more .net than j2ee. > > However, consider that MS has marketed hard that any kind of > development with Microsoft can now be tagged ".Net", which infl

Re: AW: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-30 Thread Ed Griebel
This is scary indeed. For Western NY, there's 2x .net jobs compared to plain Java, and 8x more .net than j2ee. However, consider that MS has marketed hard that any kind of development with Microsoft can now be tagged ".Net", which inflates the figures. At least that's my story :-) -ed On 6/29/05

Re: AW: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-29 Thread Larry Meadors
Cool site. Runs Java using Apache on Linux , FWIW. Larry On 6/29/05, Yan Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Even then, most of us will agree that 20.54% for IIS is about 20% to much > 2 years make it even worse.. Search on monster for .NET and J2EE > Compare the number of > jobs and

Re: AW: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-29 Thread Yan Hu
> Even then, most of us will agree that 20.54% for IIS is about 20% to much 2 years make it even worse.. Search on monster for .NET and J2EE Compare the number of jobs and do the same thing at www.indeed.com,which aggregate everything from All big jobsites in the US. Job numbers for

Re: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-29 Thread Larry Meadors
Nope, we are drinking the Kool-aide here and converting ev-er-y-thing (Lock, Stock, and Barrel) to M$ "technology". That is what happens when former M$ execs migrate into the real world and are allowed to make decisions. Larry On 6/29/05, Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I suspect

Re: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-29 Thread Dave Newton
Yan Hu wrote: If Apache web server takes 60% where did the 40% go? IIS right? I think other web servers are almost negoligiable. I responded to your comment that "Linux has never had more than 30% of the server market" by stating my belief that I thought the poster was referring to web ser

Re: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-29 Thread Leon Rosenberg
> I suspect a large portion of those apache boxen are running > Solaris and BSD as well as linux, but some shops (here for > instance) do run apache on Winblows. Of course, we have an > AS/400, too. :-( I assume you also have a mod_dotnet for running .aspx on your apache? :-) Regards Leon

Re: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-29 Thread Leon Rosenberg
> I suspect a large portion of those apache boxen are running > Solaris and BSD as well as linux, but some shops (here for > instance) do run apache on Winblows. Of course, we have an > AS/400, too. :-( I assume you also have a mod_dotnet for running .aspx on your apache? :-) Regards Leon

AW: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-29 Thread Leon Rosenberg
: Yan Hu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Juni 2005 00:15 > An: Struts Users Mailing List > Betreff: Re: [OT]Linux server market share... > > If Apache web server takes 60% where did the 40% go? IIS > right? I think other web servers are almost negoligi

AW: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-29 Thread Leon Rosenberg
: Yan Hu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Juni 2005 00:15 > An: Struts Users Mailing List > Betreff: Re: [OT]Linux server market share... > > If Apache web server takes 60% where did the 40% go? IIS > right? I think other web servers are almost negoligi

Re: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-29 Thread Larry Meadors
Apache = 69.70% Microsoft = 20.26% Sun = 2.85% Zeus = 0.90% Total = 93.71% (not sure where the other 6-7% went...) I suspect a large portion of those apache boxen are running Solaris and BSD as well as linux, but some shops (here for instance) do run apache on Winblows. Of course, we have an AS/40

Re: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-29 Thread Yan Hu
If Apache web server takes 60% where did the 40% go? IIS right? I think other web servers are almost negoligiable. --- Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yan Hu wrote: > > >>Since linux has clearly more then 50% of the server market > >> > >> > >Linux has never had more than 30% of th

Re: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-29 Thread Dave Newton
Yan Hu wrote: Since linux has clearly more then 50% of the server market Linux has never had more than 30% of the server market http://www.alwayson-network.com/comments.php?id=P5013_0_6_0_C Was probably referring to web server market share. Dve

AW: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-29 Thread Leon Rosenberg
by hp or ibm, and therefore fall out of your statistics... Regards Leon > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yan Hu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Juni 2005 00:01 > An: Struts Users Mailing List > Betreff: [OT]Linux server market share... > &

AW: [OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-29 Thread Leon Rosenberg
by hp or ibm, and therefore fall out of your statistics... Regards Leon > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yan Hu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Juni 2005 00:01 > An: Struts Users Mailing List > Betreff: [OT]Linux server market share... > &

[OT]Linux server market share...

2005-06-29 Thread Yan Hu
> Since linux has clearly more then 50% of the server market Linux has never had more than 30% of the server market http://www.alwayson-network.com/comments.php?id=P5013_0_6_0_C - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For add