--- "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find it hard to believe you're looking at a
> significant performance difference. That being
said,
> I suggest you measure it if you're really concerned
> (measure in the container, not on the browser).
> Frankly, I would say that the maintenance
ibs at the same time is probably worse than any small performance
differences.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 5:43 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: [S1] EL vs. non-EL taglibs?
>
> Howdy,
--- Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> Mmm... It's time to use some lubricant in the gears
> of my brain :-)
It's Friday -- I was barely able to send an email at
all.
d.
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better tra
Please remove me from the mailing list.
From: Dave Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 7/27/2007 6:50 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [S1] EL vs. non-EL taglibs?
--- Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> Anyway, the only reason to use Struts-EL and
Tiles-EL
> is when you have
2007/7/27, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> --- Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> > Anyway, the only reason to use Struts-EL and
> Tiles-EL
> > is when you have a pre-JSP 2.0 contaniner. Is this
> > your case?
>
> --- Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > An inherited S1.2 app has many pages where
--- Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> Anyway, the only reason to use Struts-EL and
Tiles-EL
> is when you have a pre-JSP 2.0 contaniner. Is this
> your case?
--- Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An inherited S1.2 app has many pages where both the
> EL and non-EL taglibs are used (non-JSP 2.0
> c
--- Brian Trzupek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So when we have those tags in our app, and others
> Struts controls are on the page, we will use both.
I'm asking why use both: the Struts-EL tags only add
functionality; you can still use them as the old tags
by not using an EL expression, no?
> A
2007/7/27, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> --- Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> > 2007/7/27, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I am assuming that you meant JSTL tags (not EL
> tags).
>
> Nope, I meant the Struts (1.2) and Tiles 1 EL tags,
> just like I said :)
A ok!
Anyway, the only reason
--- Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> 2007/7/27, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am assuming that you meant JSTL tags (not EL
tags).
Nope, I meant the Struts (1.2) and Tiles 1 EL tags,
just like I said :)
d.
_
2007/7/27, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Now I'm wondering if there's enough (or any?) of a
> performance hit for the EL tags that it actually makes
> sense to only use an EL tag when you actually need it
> or if there's any other reason why I might *want* to
> use both on a page.
Here I a
Dave,
As for a 'reason why I might *want* to use both on a page
I found that some jsp taglibs that we have used, rely on pulling attr
from EL tags. So when we have those tags in our app, and others
Struts controls are on the page, we will use both. Also, in some
cased we -need- to use
Howdy,
An inherited S1.2 app has many pages where both the EL
and non-EL taglibs are used (non-JSP 2.0 container)...
I don't really care for that (I've always just used
one or the other) as IMO it just confuses things.
Now I'm wondering if there's enough (or any?) of a
performance hit for the EL
12 matches
Mail list logo
