MethodFilterInterceptor

2009-07-13 Thread stanlick
Either I have been asleep at the wheel or have simply lucked into a naming scheme. It appears the MethodFilterInterceptor is performing its include/exclude logic independent of the methods' package name. Has anyone been snapped by this? Peace, Scott -- View this message in context:

Re: MethodFilterInterceptor

2009-07-13 Thread Musachy Barroso
> independent of the methods' package name I am not sure what you mean by this. example? musachy -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For ad

Re: MethodFilterInterceptor

2009-07-14 Thread stanlick
The logic considers the action name without regard to the package the action is contained within. On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > > independent of the methods' package name > > I am not sure what you mean by this. example? > > musachy > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me

Re: MethodFilterInterceptor

2009-07-14 Thread cilquirm
elf. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/MethodFilterInterceptor-%3Cpackage%3E-tp24465361p24491255.html Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@s