Two email responses consolidated in one below:
On 11/19/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/19/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> > > Yes, that was more of a post-33064 comment.
> > >
> > > Getting the the Struts tags to be 2.0-ready is
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 11/19/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Yes, that was more of a post-33064 comment.
Getting the the Struts tags to be 2.0-ready is something I'd be
interested in too. Given the origin of those tags way before 2.0,
backward compatibil
On 11/19/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> > Yes, that was more of a post-33064 comment.
> >
> > Getting the the Struts tags to be 2.0-ready is something I'd be
> > interested in too. Given the origin of those tags way before 2.0,
> > backward compatibility iss
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Yes, that was more of a post-33064 comment.
Getting the the Struts tags to be 2.0-ready is something I'd be
interested in too. Given the origin of those tags way before 2.0,
backward compatibility issues will take precedence. I wonder if
there's a better way.
Yeah, backwar
I can only speak for myself, and yes, I run ServletExec 5.0
which is compliant with Servlet 2.4 and JSP 2.0. specifications.
For more information on ServletExec:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/servletexec/index.jsp
You can download a free development copy here.
http://www.newatlanta.com/c/pr
> I keep seeing people mention JSP EL in their posts. That's
> from JSP 2.0 spec. Question is: how many servers support
> that? Just looked up Weblogic 8.1 and it doesn't support it.
> I know Tomcat 5.x supports it...
>
> Are there a lot of people using JSP 2.0 out there?
I use a Weblogic cont
6 matches
Mail list logo
