2016-09-01 1:45 GMT+02:00 Ken McWilliams :
> StackOverflow is a pretty huge site and a lot of people seek out Struts2
> Q&A there, it would be nice if the Struts 2 documentation was available via
> the new StackOverflow documentation initiative.
>
> I was tempted to simply copy good chunks of the e
> From: Doug Erickson
> To: Struts Users Mailing List ,
> Date: 01.09.2016 02:04
> Subject: Re: Struts2 documentation and Stack Overflow
>
> Stack Overflow Documentation isn't meant to duplicate existing
> documentation. It's intended to provide missing document
The Tao of SO is changing all the time, perceptions of what was or was not
acceptable years back have changed. Documentation being so new I think it's
hard to say exactly how it will establish its self. SO has _a_lot_ of
struts 2 questions... 10,334 at this time. If they were all distinct that
wo
Stack Overflow Documentation isn't meant to duplicate existing
documentation. It's intended to provide missing documentation and
compensate for poor documentation.
So, copying current documentation to SO is definitely not in line with
their goals.
It *could *be a place to create better documentat
I've not looked at the StackOverflow doc site, but I believe the
documentation is auto generated by the build process, so it might be a
challenge to keep it in-sync as new releases get published.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Ken McWilliams
wrote:
> StackOverflow is a pretty huge site and a l
StackOverflow is a pretty huge site and a lot of people seek out Struts2
Q&A there, it would be nice if the Struts 2 documentation was available via
the new StackOverflow documentation initiative.
I was tempted to simply copy good chunks of the existing documentation,
there is certainly room for i
6 matches
Mail list logo