On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Jeromy Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just thought I'd mention that Dave followed this up for you in struts-dev:
http://www.nabble.com/StrutsStatics...-td15595866.html
Just to let you know this link does not work (seems incomplete).
Maxx wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Jeromy Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just thought I'd mention that Dave followed this up for you in struts-dev:
http://www.nabble.com/StrutsStatics...-td15595866.html
Just to let you know this link does not work (seems incomplete).
--- Jeromy Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maxx wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Jeromy Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.nabble.com/StrutsStatics...-td15595866.html
Just to let you know this link does not work (seems incomplete).
Works for me in FF and IE6 and from
Strangely it first freezes my browser. Re-testing it now and it's working.
I also thought the three dots could come from a shortened url, while
it's effectively not.
Apologies.
Maxx
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wouldn't have seen that. Thanks, Jeromy. It's disturbing to see this
kind of code in 2008 and makes me wonder what other antipatterns might
exist in the struts2 codebase.
Dave Newton wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious why the developers of struts2 chose to define
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't have seen that. Thanks, Jeromy. It's disturbing to see this
kind of code in 2008 and makes me wonder what other antipatterns might
exist in the struts2 codebase.
Funny; I was thinking the same thing about the static context stuff in JSF
that makes it
I am confused here. You do know that you don't need to
extend/implement any class/interface right? Or I am missing the whole
point.
musachy
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Funny; I was thinking the same thing about the static context stuff in
JSF
that makes it
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. Classes can't stand on their own.
Neither can a class that's using a static method.
4. It's easier for Java beginners to mix business logic with
MVC framework code.
Easier? Like... typing is actually easier with S2?
Never mind, I don't get that one, and this
--- Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am confused here. You do know that you don't need to
extend/implement any class/interface right? Or I am missing the whole
point.
The original issue was regarding error messages and how they're stored in the
action rather than in a thread/instance
Funny; I was thinking the same thing about the static context stuff in
JSF
that makes it really difficult to test in isolation.
What makes you think that's difficult? I'm sure you're aware of mock
objects. There are a number of mock JSF test frameworks---JMock and Shale
come to mind. Writing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't have seen that. Thanks, Jeromy. It's disturbing to see this
kind of code in 2008 and makes me wonder what other antipatterns might
exist in the struts2 codebase.
Actually I only linked to that discussion to show that Dave had been
courteous enough to
Hi,
I'm curious why the developers of struts2 chose to define constants in an
interface (StrutsStatics) and then implement that interface in at least 18
classes (see
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/struts2-core/apidocs/org/apache/struts2/StrutsStatics.html).
Theinterface constant pattern has
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious why the developers of struts2 chose to define constants in an
interface (StrutsStatics) and then implement that interface in at least 18
classes
It's likely you'd need to ask the original WebWork developers.
Item #17, Use interfaces only to define
Dave Newton wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious why the developers of struts2 chose to define constants in an
interface (StrutsStatics) and then implement that interface in at least 18
classes
Just thought I'd mention that Dave followed this up for you in struts-dev:
14 matches
Mail list logo
