Re: HBase 0.98 vs HBase 1.1 in Trafodion Releases

2016-03-30 Thread Stack
n it?). St.Ack > On Mar 30, 2016 9:09 AM, "Stack" <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> It's 1.x AFAIK. >>> >>> HBase doesn't provid

Re: HBase 0.98 vs HBase 1.1 in Trafodion Releases

2016-03-30 Thread Stack
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's 1.x AFAIK. > > HBase doesn't provide compatibility APIs, eh? Something to consider in the > future maybe. > > What is a compatibility API? St.Ack > Gunnar > > On Tue, M

Re: HBase 0.98 vs HBase 1.1 in Trafodion Releases

2016-03-29 Thread Stack
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Carol Pearson wrote: > Hi Trafodion Users, > > As Trafodion Release 2.0 comes together, it's a challenge to make > Trafodion work with both HBase 0.98 and HBase 1.1 in the same code base. > > From discussions among Trafodion developers

Re: Logo Proposal

2016-02-12 Thread Stack
.@esgyn.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:02 PM >> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal >> >> >> >> +1 option 4 >> >> >> >> *From:* Anuradha Hegde [mailto:anuradha.he...@esgyn.com] &

Re: Trafodion Release 2.0 Hadoop/HBase Versions?

2016-02-05 Thread Stack
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Amanda Moran wrote: > The core needs to change based on the CDH or HDP version (hbase-trx*.jar > to be specific). > > Is that because of the subclassing of regionservers? If so, can we fix this; move on to coprocessors? Thanks, St.Ack