RE: [C++ native] Porting to embedded platform

2008-07-02 Thread Balasubramanyam, Shivakumar
Hi Simon, 2. The extensions avaialble do not have a consistent form, which is the most appropriate model to follow? (cpp, ws, rest?) I'm not sure but the cpp and ws have been around the longest. In what way do you see that they are inconsistent? [Shiva] Mostly in the way the code is arranged

Re: [C++ native] Porting to embedded platform

2008-07-01 Thread Simon Laws
Hi Shiva I noticed you didn't get any response. It's a while since I worked on SCA native but I'll give you my opinion. See comments in line. Regards Simon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Shivakumar Balasubramanyam < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks, > > I would like to get some feedback fr

[C++ native] Porting to embedded platform

2008-06-24 Thread Shivakumar Balasubramanyam
Folks, I would like to get some feedback from C++ developers from both server and embedded platforms. After reviewing the code, I would like to get some feedback in reducing the footprint of the code and also some help in adding extensions to unsupported transport/transport protocol. Some things