Millies, Sebastian wrote:
thanks for the quote.
Do you think this decision by OSOA well-motivated? After all, e. g. OSGi
does not
make this restriction, and OSGi services are also coarse grained and
loosely coupled.
-- Sebastian
Sebastian,
In a word: "yes" - ie it is well motivate
es are also coarse grained and
loosely coupled.
-- Sebastian
*From:* Raymond Feng [mailto:enjoyj...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 14, 2010 12:27 AM
*To:* user@tuscany.apache.org <mailto:user@tuscany.apache.org>
*Subject:* Re: Overloaded methods in Remotable interfaces
See th
Also, note an important reason for the restriction is the fact that
WSDL disallows operator overloading.
Scott
r of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com
> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com
> ____
>
> On Sep 13, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Millies, Sebastian wrote:
>
>
> why does Tuscany 1.6 forbid overloaded meth
, 2010 12:27 AM
To: user@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Re: Overloaded methods in Remotable interfaces
See the following quote from the OSOA SCA assembly spec:
702 The style of remotable interfaces is typically coarse grained and intended
for loosely coupled
703 interactions. Remotable service
On Sep 13, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Millies, Sebastian wrote:
> why does Tuscany 1.6 forbid overloaded methods in Remotable interfaces
> and throws a org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.OverloadedOperationException?
>
> Is that covered by the specs? As far as I can see, none of the
why does Tuscany 1.6 forbid overloaded methods in Remotable interfaces
and throws a org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.OverloadedOperationException?
Is that covered by the specs? As far as I can see, none of the specs on the page
http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/Service+Component+Architecture
