Hi,
the problem should be fixed now.
Best,
Peter
On 17.05.2013 12:53, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for that. I will fix it ASAP.
>
> The last rule has only three rule elements, but that should not throw an
> exception.
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
> On 17.05.2013 12:34, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de
Hi,
sorry for that. I will fix it ASAP.
The last rule has only three rule elements, but that should not throw an
exception.
Best,
Peter
On 17.05.2013 12:34, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Let A, B, C, D and F denote type names. Then, A B? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} works.
> A (B)? C D{
Hello!
Let A, B, C, D and F denote type names. Then, A B? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} works.
A (B)? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} causes a NullPointerException.
(A B)? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} causes an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException: -1.
Any ideas?
Cheers,
Armin