Re: Ruta 2.0.2 - Grouping Problems

2013-05-17 Thread Peter Klügl
Hi, the problem should be fixed now. Best, Peter On 17.05.2013 12:53, Peter Klügl wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for that. I will fix it ASAP. > > The last rule has only three rule elements, but that should not throw an > exception. > > Best, > > Peter > > On 17.05.2013 12:34, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de

Re: Ruta 2.0.2 - Grouping Problems

2013-05-17 Thread Peter Klügl
Hi, sorry for that. I will fix it ASAP. The last rule has only three rule elements, but that should not throw an exception. Best, Peter On 17.05.2013 12:34, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote: > Hello! > > Let A, B, C, D and F denote type names. Then, A B? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} works. > A (B)? C D{

Ruta 2.0.2 - Grouping Problems

2013-05-17 Thread Armin.Wegner
Hello! Let A, B, C, D and F denote type names. Then, A B? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} works. A (B)? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} causes a NullPointerException. (A B)? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} causes an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException: -1. Any ideas? Cheers, Armin