UIMA Ruta 2.1.0 Issues

2013-12-17 Thread Joerg Poecher
Hello, I would like to report some issues that occurred while testing the Ruta Workbench. There seems to be a problem with certain composed disjunctive rules in combination with quantifiers. Please see the source and input files below for clarification. OS: Windows 8.1 Eclipse

Re: UIMA Ruta 2.1.0 Issues

2013-12-17 Thread Peter Klügl
Hi, some of the rules behave as expected. It's maybe a bit counterintuitive, but I do not see a way to improve it. I will fix the rest in the next few days. An example: (SPECIAL ALL* SPECIAL) {- MARK(TMP_GenericAllSTAR)}; ALL is a parent type of SPECIAL and * is a greedy quantifier. Therefore

Re: UIMA Ruta 2.1.0 Issues

2013-12-17 Thread Alexandre Patry
On 2013-12-17 11:56, Peter Klügl wrote: Hi, some of the rules behave as expected. It's maybe a bit counterintuitive, but I do not see a way to improve it. I will fix the rest in the next few days. An example: (SPECIAL ALL* SPECIAL) {- MARK(TMP_GenericAllSTAR)}; ALL is a parent type of

Re: UIMA Ruta 2.1.0 Issues

2013-12-17 Thread Peter Klügl
Hi, the problem with the rules throwing an exception is now fixed in the current trunk. Thanks for reporting it. Best, Peter Am 13.12.2013 16:37, schrieb Joerg Poecher: Hello, I would like to report some issues that occurred while testing the Ruta Workbench. There seems to be

Re: UIMA Ruta 2.1.0 Issues

2013-12-17 Thread Peter Klügl
Am 17.12.2013 18:14, schrieb Alexandre Patry: On 2013-12-17 12:10, Peter Klügl wrote: Am 17.12.2013 18:00, schrieb Alexandre Patry: On 2013-12-17 11:56, Peter Klügl wrote: Hi, some of the rules behave as expected. It's maybe a bit counterintuitive, but I do not see a way to improve it. I