Re: Uima Annotation Viewer view selection causing StackOverflow

2016-03-14 Thread Hector Liu
Marshall Schor writes: > > Hi Hector, > > It would greatly help if you could supply a small test case. > > I'm guessing this problem occurs with the CVD (Cas Visual Debugger) tool, is > that correct? > > I'm also guessing that you have to load into the tool something that has > multiple Sofas

Re: Problem matching adjacent annotations using Ruta

2016-03-14 Thread Mario Juric
Hi Peter, Seems we uncovered the problem. It is not directly related to Ruta. We construct our view by mapping content from another view and for the affected documents we insert some text in the same process. We messed up in the mapping process and accidentally mapped some ruta basic annotation

Re: Problem matching adjacent annotations using Ruta

2016-03-14 Thread Peter Klügl
hmm, sounds like a bug. Can you add SPACE to the retained types: RETAINTYPE(WS, SPACE, BREAK); This should not change anything, but... Why did A PERIOD SPACE not match? Do have a have a reproducible example? I promise that I will do something about the visiblity in the next releses. Best, Pet

Problem matching adjacent annotations using Ruta

2016-03-14 Thread Mario Juric
Hi, We try to do a simple match on two adjacent annotations but for some reason it dosen’t always work. The rule looks like this: A B { -> CREATE(C, 2, "prop"="val")}; This work for many documents but not for all. Looking at a failed example document we can see that B starts exactly where A st