Re: Using RUTA

2017-02-28 Thread Peter Klügl
hmmm ok, maybe my example for testing the rule was too simple. I will create a more complex example and check the results Peter Am 28.02.2017 um 15:38 schrieb José Vicente Moyano Murillo: > Hi Peter, > > I'm sorry but this example does not work properly. It seems that it is a > problem regardi

Re: Using RUTA

2017-02-28 Thread Peter Kluegl
hmmm ok, maybe my example for testing the rule was too simple. I will create a more complex example and check the results Peter Am 28.02.2017 um 15:38 schrieb José Vicente Moyano Murillo: > Hi Peter, > > I'm sorry but this example does not work properly. It seems that it is a > problem regardi

Re: Using RUTA

2017-02-28 Thread José Vicente Moyano Murillo
Hi Peter, I'm sorry but this example does not work properly. It seems that it is a problem regarding conjunction rules (%) This is our test case and result. We have a book with 5 attributes - name - author - pages - ISBN - Category The rule is validatin name and author. RUTA creates the annota

Re: Using RUTA

2017-02-28 Thread Peter Kluegl
Hi, operations directly on lists and arrays are on my todo list but not yet implemented. Right now, there are still some options like a variable or restricted assignments. Here's an example with an ANNOTATIONLIST variable: ANNOTATIONLIST list; Book{-> CREATE(NeilsBook, "attributes" = list)}

Re: Using RUTA

2017-02-28 Thread José Vicente Moyano Murillo
Hi Peter, we have another question regarding the same example. Right now all is working properly (many thanks) and it seems that 2.5.1-SNAPSHOT it's fine. Now we are planning to store some information in the created annotation. We want to store all the attributes that matches the RUTA rule. It i