I downloaded this documentation from the website. I am assuming since it's
the only Developers Guide available on the website that it was the latest
version. Am I mistaken? Where can I get the latest version of the docs?
-Original Message-
From: Chema [mailto:demablo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sa
Do you have statememnt logging enabled?
On 1/31/09, MGG List Subscription wrote:
> When I format the SQL within my insert element like Example 1.0 and time
> several application calls the performance is degraded *substantially*.
> However, if I format the SQL as shown in Example 1.1 the performan
Yes, yours is old.
Mine is dated on November 30, 2006 (2.3.x )
2009/1/31 M. Goodell :
> Thanks for your help. I do not see a reference to statementCaching in my
> version of the docs.
>
> See:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ibatis/trunk/java/ibatis-2/ibatis-2-docs/en/
> iBATIS-SqlMaps-2_en
Thanks for your help. I do not see a reference to statementCaching in my
version of the docs.
See:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ibatis/trunk/java/ibatis-2/ibatis-2-docs/en/
iBATIS-SqlMaps-2_en.pdf
Is there more recent docs available other than the ones I have?
-Original Message-
From:
About docs:
statementCachingEnabled (iBATIS versions 2.3.0 and later)
With this setting enabled, iBATIS will maintain a local cache of
prepared statements. This can lead to significant performance
improvements.
Example: statementCachingEnabled="true"
Default: true (enabled)
I asked you this quest
Version: ibatis-2.3.4.726
Not using statement caching as far as I know.
Could you please provide a brief example of turning on statement caching? I
have read without it there is a performance hit.
Thanks!
M. Goodell
-Original Message-
From: Chema [mailto:demablo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sa
What version are you using ?
Do you have statement caching enabled ?
2009/1/31 M. Goodell :
> Looking further into this it seems to have little to do with the CDATA tag
> but the formatting of the SQL statement. The more formatting applied to the
> SQL statement, the slower the performance.
>
> F
Looking further into this it seems to have little to do with the CDATA tag
but the formatting of the SQL statement. The more formatting applied to the
SQL statement, the slower the performance.
Format A is much slower than Format A
(Format A)
INSERT INTO
people (
last_name,
Here is some more information:
1.) Using (Format A) and inserting 10,000 records this takes roughly 12-15
seconds.
(Format A)
2.) Using (Format B) and inserting 10,000 records this takes roughly 7-8
seconds.
(Format B)
INSERT INTO people (
last_name,
first_name,
age
) V
And without CDATA tag ? Same performance ?
Indeed, I don't know why you use it for that query
2009/1/31 MGG List Subscription :
> When I format the SQL within my insert element like Example 1.0 and time
> several application calls the performance is degraded *substantially*.
> However, if I forma
When I format the SQL within my insert element like Example 1.0 and time
several application calls the performance is degraded *substantially*.
However, if I format the SQL as shown in Example 1.1 the performance
improves dramatically.
It seems the larger the SQL statement and the more "pretty" fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
