Not really!!! The 'Current schema' register controls this, you can even
change it by executing a 'SET CURRENT SCHEMA = XXX'
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/db2luw/v9r7/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.db2.luw.sql.ref.doc/doc/r0005877.html
Mario
Hi Guys,
I was very surprised to find out that 2.3.0 was the last version that supported
Java 1.4.2, and yet the latest version is only 4 micro versions above 2.3.0,
sitting at 2.3.4. Why would iBatis change something so major, in a micro
version? I would have expected that iBatis would have
I have tried that, but DB2 does not like it, if you do not specify schema DB2
automatically inserts UserID as the schema name
Mario Briggs wrote:
>
> If would suggest rather to remove the harcoding of schema in the SQL
> statements now. In the long run this effort will be less than maintaini
If would suggest rather to remove the harcoding of schema in the SQL
statements now. In the long run this effort will be less than maintaining 2
sets of files
Mario
pczurak
Trenton,
Thanks for the input. As a team we felt that given the fact that Java 5
came out in 2004 we gave the community ample time to upgrade :) The added
features and performance gains were enough for us to jump. I think the
right move for us was a minor release increment.
In fact
J2SE 5.
you must be kidding. I have to work with those two everyday...
jk love you guys!
on a serious note I have some ibatis in action books for sale, get them
before they get outdated
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Clinton Begin wrote:
> LOL Nice Larry. :-)
>
> No, you can expect free docu
You could use Ant to supply the ${schema} replacements for you.. just
make sure it doesn't accidentally catch any other "runtime"
${parameters}
Clinton
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:28 PM, pczurak wrote:
>
> Thank you for all of your help!
>
> I think I will just have 2 sets of XML files, one f
Thank you for all of your help!
I think I will just have 2 sets of XML files, one for Test and one for
production, just have to remember to update or change both when something
changes.
Andy Law wrote:
>
>
> pczurak wrote:
>>
>> I am sorry, I am very new to iBates, I do not know what this m
If you could write a quick unit test to demonstrate the broken
behavior, it might help. Nathan just wrote a mapper and it was loaded
automatically, so something must be different somewhere...
Note: The namespace must equal the fully qualified name of the CLASS,
not the PACKAGE
Clinton
On M
Hi all,
The mirrors have updated and iBATIS 3 Beta 2 is now ready to roll.
All known issues submitted in JIRA and discussed on this list have
been implemented (unless I missed something). :-)
Feel free to use this thread to discuss any new Beta 2 questions, or
use JIRA to log any issues.
Cheers
Adding the explicit mapping seems to work (or at least it gets me to another
error of the sort I would expect to see). I don't think I'm doing anything
strange, so I'm not sure why it doesn't automatically load
Thanks Clinton
Clinton Begin wrote:
>
> Strange, it should add it automatically if
Strange, it should add it automatically if the namespace shares the
name of a class. That said, you can add it manually...
sqlSessionFactory.getConfiguration().addMapper(Your.class);
I'll add this to the documentation.
Clinton
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:14 AM, RichadB wrote:
>
> Hello
>
>
>
> I
pczurak wrote:
>
> I am sorry, I am very new to iBates, I do not know what this means
>
> "You'll have to make
> $schema$ a property of your parameter object. "
>
> how do I do this, can you point me to an example?
>
>
OK. When you hit the iBatis query code, you pass in a 'parameter' objec
Hello
I am new to iBatis and am trying to get started with the Beta version of
iBatis 3.0.
I have set up a very simple test for myself this includes
An interface that defines the query
=
package com.aimhedge.trading.database;
import java.util.List;
import org.apache.ibatis.annot
14 matches
Mail list logo
