No rush. I just don't want to lose track of them.
Clinton
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:11 AM, wrote:
> Sorry, I was just waiting for more feedback about the desirability of
> the prefix and property/field changes and I thought that you've filed
> a ticket for the other one. I can't create them just
Sorry, I was just waiting for more feedback about the desirability of
the prefix and property/field changes and I thought that you've filed
a ticket for the other one. I can't create them just right so I'll
do it tonight GMT-3 :).
Best regards
--
Carlos
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 08:28:25AM -0600, C
Added JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-647
and yes, commit(true) helps :)
Best Regards
Håkan Andersson
On 07/09/09 16:22, Clinton Begin wrote:
> Ah... interesting. This is a bug. The cache in iBATIS is
> transactional. iBATIS also has a "feature" that only commits a
> transac
Carlos, are you going to create JIRA tickets for your 3 suggestions? (this
prefix one, the property/field order, and the unconstrained mapper methods)
If it isn't in JIRA, it doesn't have a hope of getting done. :-)
Clinton
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Clinton Begin wrote:
> Your posts are
Ah... interesting. This is a bug. The cache in iBATIS is transactional.
iBATIS also has a "feature" that only commits a transaction if a change was
detected. These two features are conflicting. Since selects don't count as
a "change", the transactional cache never flushes.
If you call session.
Hi
Sorry for being unclear, I will try to explain a little better what I
have done.
I have a fully working web application with the latest ibatis beta
3.0.0.200 and what I did was to add to a
mapper, TestCache implements org.apache.ibatis.cache.Cache but at the
moment it only have logging statem
