of it I guess. ;-)
>
> Larry
>
>
>
> On 7/22/05, Bing Zou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, I read that thread. Unfortunately, there don't exist many unit
> > tests that directly test the correctness of the iBATIS queries. All
> > the queries have b
d yesterday or Wednesday, you can probably
> find the thread in the archive.
>
> -ed
>
> On 7/22/05, Bing Zou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We are doing a lot of refactoring and one issue came up was that
> > moving JavaBean, renaming
Hi all,
We are doing a lot of refactoring and one issue came up was that
moving JavaBean, renaming or overloading setter/getters could break
the existing iBATIS queries. But we have to wait till runtime and test
every related functionality for that purpose.
I am wondering whether there is a way w
Hi,
I have one question about dynamic sorting:
Now for every sql statement that I want to apply dynamic sorting, I
have to manually add "$OrderByClause$" at the end of that sql
statement, which will be replaced by real "ORDER BY xxx" at runtime.
I am wondering whether there is a way to append $Ord
how it turns out.
>
> Cheers,
> Clinton
>
> On 6/16/05, Bing Zou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry for this lengthy thread. I didn't mean to offend, iBATIS is a
> > great framework and there are a lot of companies including mine that
> > are usi
uot;, p_userID);
> >sqlMap.insert("insertIntoTempTable", args); // <<<<<<
> HOTSPOT
> > }
> > sqlMap.executeBatch();
>
>
> sqlMap.commitTransaction();
>
> } finally {
>sqlMap.endTran
> in both the iBATIS test case as well as the JDBC test case, which is more
> fair.
>
> Good luck.
>
> Clinton
>
>
> On 6/16/05, Bing Zou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FYI:
> > I debugged the code and found out that the SQLMapSessionImpl object
&g
transactionState called "STATE_USER_PROVIDED", I guess this
is the value of transactionState while using "EXTERNAL" transaction
manager?
Thanks.
Bing
On 6/16/05, Bing Zou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just checked the iBATIS source code.
>
> The SqlMapExecutorDelegate.
iBATIS?
Thanks.
Bing
On 6/16/05, Bing Zou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why iBATIS batch has to be within a transaction while JDBC batch doesn't?
>
> Thanks.
> Bing
>
> On 6/16/05, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > no, that looks right.