Vinny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 11/10/05, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...While you're at it, I don't think caching works unless you pass
> > in parameters; I have MANY parameterless queries and I haven't
> > been able to see them get cached yet (stay tuned).
>
>
> Is thi
On 11/10/05, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...While you're at it, I don't think caching
> works unless you pass in parameters; I have MANY parameterless queries and I
> haven't been able to
> see them get cached yet (stay tuned).
Is this true? Parameterless queries like SELECT * FROM
u meant by non-result
> vs. empty result?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Benedict [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 6:48 PM
> To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Cacheing rowless queries?
>
> Niels,
>
> That&#
empty result?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Benedict [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 6:48 PM
To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cacheing rowless queries?
Niels,
That's like a really awesome idea. What kind of marker do you propose to
determine a
Niels,
That's like a really awesome idea. What kind of marker do you propose to
determine a non-result
from an empty result? I would find this super valuable. While you're at it, I
don't think caching
works unless you pass in parameters; I have MANY parameterless queries and I
haven't been able
Hi,
How difficult / desirable would it be to code a feature in the cacheing
mechanism to keep track of queries that do not return any objects? In our
case, we end up hitting the database many times for queries that don't
return objects. It would be nice to check a cache of non-results to avoid
t
