gt; > snippet
> > calling those procedures?
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:44 AM, CuriousMind
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi Nichol,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your response. We are
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:44 AM, CuriousMind
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Nichol,
>>
>> Thanks for your response. We are already using same transaction while
>> calling these procedures.
>> But we are not getting expected results.
>>
>>
>>
>
n a single transaction and
>> > proc2
>> > will see package level variables set in proc1. Note that executing those
>> > procs on a single connection object is not enough (i.e. you need
>> > transaction).
>> >
>> > hth
>> >
>> >
ction).
> >
> > hth
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:48 AM, CuriousMind
> > wrote:
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/PL-SQL-package-level-variables-tp24802267p24802615.html
> Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list ar
d
> wrote:
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/PL-SQL-package-level-variables-tp24802267p24802615.html
Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
that
> the current thread will always receive same connection instance?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/PL-SQL-package-level-variables-tp24802267p24802267.html
> Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
ntegration with ibatis.). I think this can be resolved only if current
thread will get same connection instance. Is there any way to ensure that
the current thread will always receive same connection instance?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/PL-SQL-package-level
