im using EJB as my external transaction manager
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Transaction-Performance-Issue-tp16583884p16739622.html
Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
anything in my EJB that controls transactions. In this case, how is
> iBATIS handling the commits?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Transaction-Performance-Issue-tp16583884p16739287.html
> Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
bble.com/Transaction-Performance-Issue-tp16583884p16739287.html
Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 11/04/2008, Vannel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry about not being clear. Initially I was trying to give an example and in
> the later post I decided to give a more accurate representation of my
> program. I dont think I am using any form of caching unless it's on by
> default. To be ab
r the
update(). However, the client is unable to see the updated information
immediately. Only after some delay of a few seconds will the client be able
to see the update.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Transaction-Performance-Issue-tp16583884p16627288.html
Sent from the i
; ---
>
> in the above situation, would there be a return from the select statement
> AND another return from the update statement? or, would there only be 1
> return after the whole sqlmap has been completed?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabb
://www.nabble.com/Transaction-Performance-Issue-tp16583884p16624028.html
Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
their request.
Hopefully I haven't gone too far from what you are really experiencing...
-Original Message-----
From: Vannel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:18 PM
To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org
Subject: Re: Transaction Performance Issue
the problem lies in the f
ther after
some extensive testing.
anyway, if anyone else any suggestions, please do post. i think i might ask
on an Oracle forum instead and see what suggestions i get.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Transaction-Performance-Issue-tp16583884p16599708.html
Sent from the iBATI
assurance that the user will be able to notice the change.
>
> does anyone have any suggestions? i suspect it might be an issue with how
> Oracle handles SQL since i am able to get a positive return from it. could
> it be an issue with how iBATIS works?
>
> --
> View this mes
urn from it. could
it be an issue with how iBATIS works?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Transaction-Performance-Issue-tp16583884p16583884.html
Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
11 matches
Mail list logo