Re: force flushOnExecute without real query

2009-04-28 Thread WhyDontYouSlide
ry defined in "somequeryname" >> >> >> >> >> but.. can I simply do nothing instead of calling a statement here? >> >> >> >> > >>doing nothing here... >> >> /> >> >> doing this way I could fo

Re: force flushOnExecute without real query

2009-04-28 Thread Nicholoz Koka Kiknadze
g this way I could for example be able to call the flush "on demand" > from a DTO outside > > thx > whydontyouslide > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/force-flushOnExecute-without-real-query-tp23274367p23274367.html > Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

force flushOnExecute without real query

2009-04-28 Thread WhyDontYouSlide
doing this way I could for example be able to call the flush "on demand" from a DTO outside thx whydontyouslide -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/force-flushOnExecute-without-real-query-tp23274367p23274367.html Sent from the iBATIS - User - Java mailing list archive at Nabble.com.