-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Blaisorblade wrote:
| Jeff, now we need actively to make sure everything we think is crucial is
| merged in 2.6.11 - release is approaching (after -rc2 only a handful of
| patches is being merged, and the announce says "Make sure I have
| everything"),
I would like a 2.4 that is stable. with a working hostfs.
(that i can run valgrind against - heh, not umls fault here.)
Also, the uml web site needs to be authoritative. building
the above should not require patching from additional
sources announced on the list.
That said, 2.4 and 2.6 are both 'st
+1
For my purposes I need solid, stable code. I prefer a a 2.4 and 2.6
kernel that builds without too many config gotchas. And runs reliably.
e.g. right now I am using the blaisorblade 2.6.9-bs patches and the
pre-hostfs 2.4 code. That works well.
I'm all for different UML trees/patches tha
arch/um/Kconfig_arch is actually a symlink, so
* Remove it from the tree.
* Make sure it is removed during make mrproper.
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
linux-2.6.11-paolo/arch/um/Makefile |8 ++--
linux-2.6.11/arch/um/Kconfig_arch | 16 ---
Jeff,
Where and when can we see the PPC port of UML?
Maybe you can port a preview patch to the community before you put
it into the tree?
Thanks
Juergen
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open sou
Description: see patch.
Bodo
From: Bodo Stroesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The SKAS3 host patch isn't smp-safe.
The wrong part is the implementation of PTRACE_LDT.
If the ptraced child runs on an other processor than its parent,
and the child's mm still is the active_mm, the changed LDT
isn't flushed
On Wednesday 26 January 2005 11:24, Sven Köhler wrote:
Please note this exact sentence:
> > I.e. the compilation problem is not in the kernel module, right?
> > In this
> > case, the problem is that you have /usr/include/asm symlinked to your
> > kernel's include/asm-i386 directory, which is th
I.e. the compilation problem is not in the kernel module, right? In this case,
the problem is that you have /usr/include/asm symlinked to your kernel's
include/asm-i386 directory, which is the wrong setup. However your solution
should not give any problem.
Kernel-Modules are usually compiled aga
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 23:46, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:37:57PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 January 2005 22:54, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 06:39:26PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> >
> > Well, it should be fixed in the -mm tree
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:37:57PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 January 2005 22:54, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 06:39:26PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Well, it should be fixed in the -mm tree (and probably in 2.6.11-rc2-bk2, I
> guess, though it's not tested).
10 matches
Mail list logo
