Re: [uml-devel] 2.6.11 + uml.sf.net patches panic (now fixed, replaced by CPU problem)

2005-03-05 Thread Peter
Hi. I just tried 2.6.11 + jeff's patches (which are now against 2.6.11 and appear to include bodo's patch from below). With this codebase I was able to startup tomcat without getting the kernel crash I reported previously. Cool. There were some problems though. My feedback on this setup is b

[uml-devel] Re: Partial fix! - Was: Re: [BUG report] UML linux-2.6 latest BK doesn't compile

2005-03-05 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 02:45:18PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Yes. I finally found a way to get it to compile. Compiling without > > TT mode and WITHOUT static build it still fails with the same problem > > (__bb_init_func problem I already reported). But compiling wit

[uml-devel] Re: Partial fix! - Was: Re: [BUG report] UML linux-2.6 latest BK doesn't compile

2005-03-05 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Yes. I finally found a way to get it to compile. Compiling without > TT mode and WITHOUT static build it still fails with the same problem > (__bb_init_func problem I already reported). But compiling without TT > but WITH static build the __bb_init_func problem goes awa

Re: [uml-devel] stdin lockup using con0=fd:0,fd:1 (guest 2.4.26-3um)

2005-03-05 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 02 March 2005 23:10, D. Bahi wrote: > did i miss the console cleanup crew? ? Not understood, 2.4 didn't get the big cleanup. > i have a UML guest command line that uses con0=fd:0,fd:1 > (or not, as this is the default for CONFIG_CON_ZERO_CHAN) > > i launch new xterms using -- xterm -e

Re: [uml-devel] Triage on the pending patches

2005-03-05 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 04 March 2005 03:11, Rob Landley wrote: > On Thursday 03 March 2005 01:43 pm, Jeff Dike wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > Well, just in case your job was too easy, here's one more. Using the > > > "quiet" option shows a couple of lines being printed out by printf > > > that should

Re: [uml-devel] UML freezes at hdd-intensive processes

2005-03-05 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 03 March 2005 11:41, Oliver Baltz wrote: > Hi @all, > > my UML hangs while intensive processes that use the HDD. For example: > rgrep, upgrade,... > > UML-Hostsystem: 2.4.27-1-386, Intel ICH5 SATA 150-Controller > UML: 2.4.26-3um-1 > > Any ideas? Tell us the result: grep CONFIG_BLK_DEV

Re: [uml-devel] SKAS3 v8 for x86_64

2005-03-05 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 04 March 2005 01:24, Anthony Brock wrote: > Recently some individuals posted a "port" of the SKAS 3 patch to x86_64. > However, this port was for the 2.4 kernel. And I know it didn't work... sadly. > Has anyone worked on porting > SKAS 3 (especially v7 or v8) to the x86_64 architecture o