[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> If there is a wish list I wouldn't mind seeing it. And I did
> volunteer, I just don't have the experience nor the resources (e.g.
> hotmail will not do) to do it without some handholding and support.
I can give you hosting on www.user-mode-linux.org. And no experie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Attached are two patches. The first one, uml_net-slip.diff, is the
> minimal patch to apply to uml_net. The second one, uml_net-uml.diff,
> applies to 2.4.27-1um (note the half-hearted attempt to plug a FD
> leak in there as well). As a nice bonus, a UML with this pa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Try the patch.
Just merged it, thanks.
Jeff
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which product
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> No, my claim is that no sane gcc 3.3 defines __gcov_init.
Ah, OK. Thanks for the clarification.
Jeff
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 06:53:15PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > And therefore you added a patch that helps only those distros at the
> > price of breaking other people and distros using sane compilers?
>
> Didn't you start this thread by pointing out that SuSE has a gcc 3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> And therefore you added a patch that helps only those distros at the
> price of breaking other people and distros using sane compilers?
Didn't you start this thread by pointing out that SuSE has a gcc 3.3.4
which isn't? I would call that a compiler which lies about its
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > +
> > + init_completion(&port->done),
> > +
>
> I'll convert that to a semicolon...
Gawd, thanks...
Jeff
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hu
On Friday 11 March 2005 04:18 pm, Oliver Baltz wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> > Is it write-intensive, read-intensive, combination of both, or either
> > one?
>
> I think it is a combination of both: When installing just one single
> debian-package the UML often freezes :-(
>
> Is there an alternative to UBD
Hi Rob,
> Is it write-intensive, read-intensive, combination of both, or either one?
I think it is a combination of both: When installing just one single
debian-package the UML often freezes :-(
Is there an alternative to UBD?
Oliver
> On Friday 11 March 2005 09:29 am, Oliver Baltz wrote:
>>
Rob Landley wrote:
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 09:15 pm, Jeff Dike wrote:
This implements a hardware random number generator for UML which attaches
itself to the host's /dev/random.
Direct use of /dev/random always makes me nervous. I've had a recurring
problem with /dev/random blocking, and gene
On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:16, Jeff Dike wrote:
> The init function called by gcc when gcov is enabled is __gcov_init or
> __bb_init_func, depending on the gcc version. Anton is using 3.3.4 and
> seeing __gcov_init. I'm using 3.3.2 and seeing __bb_init_func, so we need
> to close that gap a bit
On Friday 11 March 2005 20:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorry, resending this.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
-
On Friday 11 March 2005 20:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Export this symbol which is now needed for a typo fix (getuid() ->
> getgid()).
Sorry for resending, I sent it wrong twice.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
On Friday 11 March 2005 20:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorry, ignore this, I'm resending it.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
On Thursday 10 March 2005 09:12, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 20:52 +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > > Are you sure this is really the best option in this instance?
> > > Sometimes, static data initialisation is more efficient than
> > > code-based manual initialisation, especially
This time, I've announced this on my homepage, since I'd like to get a lot
more testing and to release this patch unchanged as -V8 final version.
Things I've forgot:
* make it apply easily on Fedora kernels.
This should simply mean moving the TIF_SYSCALL_EMU to place no.8, to leave a
slot free
Jeff Dike wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm just thinking about those UML hosting farms, with several UML
instances per machine, on machines which haven't got a keyboard
attached constantly feeding entropy into the pool.
That's when you set the network links to feed entropy. It may not be
very
On Thursday 10 March 2005 19:41, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 March 2005 09:15 pm, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > This implements a hardware random number generator for UML which attaches
> > itself to the host's /dev/random.
>
> Direct use of /dev/random always makes me nervous. I've had a recurrin
This happened with CONFIG_HIGHMEM enabled on a almost-vanilla 2.6.11... with
that option disabled I don't see such problems (also tested on both the same
exact kernel, and with nearby ones).
To sum up, there is a read() syscall, a copy_to_user() (which calls kmap())
with preemption disabled (in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I'm just thinking about those UML hosting farms, with several UML
> instances per machine, on machines which haven't got a keyboard
> attached constantly feeding entropy into the pool. If just ONE of
> them is serving ssl connections from its own /dev/urandom, that wou
On Friday 11 March 2005 00:21, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This patch is still wrong.
>
> Can't we just fix it by havign an alias for both names?
No, because the patch is wrong. It should export both symbols in the second
case.
> It seems stupid to
> jump t
On Thursday 10 March 2005 23:53, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 09:16:02PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > The init function called by gcc when gcov is enabled is __gcov_init or
> > __bb_init_func, depending on the gcc version. Anton is using 3.3.4 and
> > seeing __gcov_init. I'm using
Okay, UML repeats its output when the pipe it's writing into fills up
until it returns -EAGAIN. I can reproduce this even on a fast machine
by repeatedly suspending the xterm that UML is running under with a dumb
little script ala:
while /bin/true
do
kill -STOP $PID
sleep 1
>> > ( (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ == 3 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ >= 4)
>> > && \
>> >HEAVILY_PATCHED_SUSE_GCC )
>> > I hope SuSE has added some #define to distinguish what they call "gcc
>> > 3.3.4" from GNU gcc 3.3.4
>> It wasn't lost - I am just disinclined to cater to distros making thei
On Friday 11 March 2005 09:29 am, Oliver Baltz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my problem still exists: the UML hangs om hdd-intensive processess (like
> apt-get dist-upgrade). I tried a lot of things in time:
>
> o tried on 2 machines with different hardware, different Host- and
> Guest-Kernels
> o CONFIG_BLK_DE
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:48:54PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > This patch is still wrong.
> > It seems my comment on this [1] was lost:
> > <-- snip -->
> > This line has to be something like
> > ( (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ == 3 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ >= 4)
> > &&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> This patch is still wrong.
> It seems my comment on this [1] was lost:
> <-- snip -->
> This line has to be something like
> ( (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ == 3 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ >= 4)
> && \
>HEAVILY_PATCHED_SUSE_GCC )
> I hope SuSE has added some #define
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Can't we just fix it by havign an alias for both names? It seems
> stupid to jump through hoops and worry about compiler versions, when
> afaik we could just do something like
> extern (...) __attribute__((alias("")));
> instead. Exact details left to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
user-mode-linux-devel±z¦n!!¥´ÂZ±z!!
KK¡A(¼s§i)
KK¡A¥þ°ê«Ç¤º³]p¸ËæC¤£½×user-mode-linux-devel±z¦³¤°»ò¼Ëªº¸ËæC©Î¸Ë׻ݨD
KK¡A§Ú̳£¥i¥HªA°È¨ì®a!
KK
KK¡A¥þ°ê«Ç¤º³]p¸ËæCºôÂX¤jÀç·~
KK¡A¦pªGuser-mode-linux-devel±z©Î±zªB¤Í¦³ª«·~¤£ºÞ¬O¦í®aªÅ¶¡©Î¬O°Ó·~ªÅ¶¡¬Æ¦Ü¼t¿ì¤j¼Ó
KK¡A»Ýn§Ú̪º±M·~ªA
Hi,
my problem still exists: the UML hangs om hdd-intensive processess (like
apt-get dist-upgrade). I tried a lot of things in time:
o tried on 2 machines with different hardware, different Host- and
Guest-Kernels
o CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBD_SYNC is not set
o tried ext2/reiserfs on the Guest-UML
o when
30 matches
Mail list logo
