[uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] uml ubd: handle readonly status

2005-04-25 Thread Jeff Dike
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 09:19:49PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > + /* This should no more be needed. And it didn't work anyway to exclude > + * read-write remounting of filesystems.*/ > + /*if((filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) && !dev->openflags.w){ > if(--dev->count == 0)

[uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] uml: fix handling of no fpx_regs [critical, for 2.6.12]

2005-04-25 Thread Alexander Nyberg
mån 2005-04-25 klockan 21:12 +0200 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > From: Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Fix the error path, which is triggered when the processor misses the fpx regs > (i.e. the "fxsr" cpuinfo feature). For instance by V

[uml-devel] Re: [patch 7/7] uml ubd: handle readonly status

2005-04-25 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 25 April 2005 12:16, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > @@ -1099,6 +1104,7 @@ static int prepare_request(struct reques > > if((rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE) && !dev->openflags.w){ > > printk("Write attempted on readonly ubd device %s\n", > >

[uml-devel] [patch 1/1] uml: fix handling of no fpx_regs [critical, for 2.6.12]

2005-04-25 Thread blaisorblade
From: Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix the error path, which is triggered when the processor misses the fpx regs (i.e. the "fxsr" cpuinfo feature). For instance by VIA C3 Samuel2. Tested and obvious, please merge ASAP. Signed-off-by:

[uml-devel] Re: [patch 7/7] uml ubd: handle readonly status

2005-04-25 Thread Jens Axboe
On Sun, Apr 24 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > @@ -1099,6 +1104,7 @@ static int prepare_request(struct reques > if((rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE) && !dev->openflags.w){ > printk("Write attempted on readonly ubd device %s\n", > disk->disk_name); > +