[uml-devel] Status of 2.6.[10-11] constant 1 loadavg?

2005-05-03 Thread Christopher S. Aker
Has the constant "loadavg of 1" bug been resolved, or has the patch been accepted into 2.6.12? Blaisorblade -- it appears to be back. My recent tests with 2.6.11 vanilla still exhibit this problem. -Chris --- This SF.Net email is sponsored

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic with 2.6.11.6

2005-05-03 Thread Anthony Brock
One final test. The following allowed the crash to finish. Also, the crash occurred as soon as I hit the "down" arrow on my keyboard. I'm beginning to wonder if this is somehow related to the readline libraries or bash: myserver:~# Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0806b21f

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic with 2.6.11.6

2005-05-03 Thread Anthony Brock
Well, debug information didn't seem to have any positive effect. Here are the additional configure parameters I turned on: CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y Let me know if I'm missing something or need to turn on additional parameters. Also, please note that this

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic with 2.6.11.6

2005-05-03 Thread Anthony Brock
Hmmm, I think I need to recompile the kernel with debug information. In any case, here are the results: myserver:~# Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0806b21f in chan_interrupt () (gdb) bt #0 0x0806b21f in chan_interrupt () #1 0x in ?? () (gdb) c Continuing. Ker

[uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] x86_64: make string func definition work as intended

2005-05-03 Thread Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In include/asm-x86_64/string.h there are such comments: > > /* Use C out of line version for memcmp */ > #define memcmp __builtin_memcmp > int memcmp(const void * cs,const void * ct,size_t count); > > This would mean that if the compiler does not decide to use __