On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:23:26PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> - we have sysdep inside arch/um/include, and include "sysdep/"; that's
> nice.
>
> - we should do the same for os-, moving arch/um/os-Linux/include/* to
> arch/um/include/os-Linux/*, and include "os/file.h" (by doing a symlink)
mode_kern-skas.h was named that way for similarity with other headers, which
are named -tt and -skas for TT and SKAS specific versions. However, it would
be nice to clean up the includes altogether:
- we have sysdep inside arch/um/include, and include "sysdep/"; that's
nice.
- we should do
Lee Revell wrote:
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 09:03 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Blaisorblade wrote:
Nope. They started again five days ago.
Would anybody restore the link from the main www.kernel.org/ page, then? I
only see there (and in the finger banner) the 2.4 snapshots, not the 2.6
ones.
I just
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 03:37:33PM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> >...
> > The /dev/null trick only works well for adding files, not removing them.
>
> It works fine for removing files except when they have a zero length.
>
Then a two-patch approach wo
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 03:37:33PM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>...
> The /dev/null trick only works well for adding files, not removing them.
It works fine for removing files except when they have a zero length.
> Regards
> Henrik
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling T
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:34:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I'll just ask Linus to delete it ;)
make distclean should delete it too. I never worry about zero length
file, they'll be deleted eventually.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by
Well, the new version didn't waste any time! It crashed on my first keystroke.
The output is below. This is on a 2.6.12-rc4 guest with the full patch set from
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/patches.html applied. Finally, I deleted
'include/asm-um/elf.h' from the source tree prior to comp
Blaisorblade wrote:
Nope. They started again five days ago.
Would anybody restore the link from the main www.kernel.org/ page, then? I
only see there (and in the finger banner) the 2.4 snapshots, not the 2.6
ones.
I just found
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/, but only by
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 09:03 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> >
> >>Nope. They started again five days ago.
> >
> > Would anybody restore the link from the main www.kernel.org/ page, then? I
> > only see there (and in the finger banner) the 2.4 snapshots, not the 2.6
> > one
Okay, it compiles! However, it also issues the following warning:
make[1]: `arch/um/sys-i386/util/mk_thread' is up to date.
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST
*** Warning: "getgid" [fs/hostfs/hostfs.ko] undefined!
>>> Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/10/05 03:19AM >>>
On Monday 09 May 20
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
diff -L include/asm-um/elf.h -puN include/asm-um/elf.h~uml-remove-elf-h /dev/null
hmm, that's exciting. How to tell diff and patch to remove a zero-length
file?
This has to be instructed by the patch.. If the new file is an empty file
with timestamp of 1 J
ompilation of UML/s390 is broken with the latest
incrementals.
Unfortunately it's still unclear, what the necessary change
in s390-host will look like. So I don't want to "release"
implemetation of UML/s390 yet.
Bodo
patches-20050510.tar
Description: Unix tar archive
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 12:42, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 May 2005 02:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had,
> > > > > we're maybe several we
Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 10 May 2005 02:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're
> > > > maybe several weeks away from 2.6.12,
> > >
> > > Several weeks away?
> >
>
On Monday 09 May 2005 18:40, Anthony Brock wrote:
> First, I would appreciate it if someone can remind me of where to download
> the '-mm' tree.
>
> Second, I downloaded at attempted to compile 2.6.12-rc4. Unfortunately, I'm
> unable to compile it due to the following error:
Remove include/asm-um/e
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 02:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're
> > > maybe several weeks away from 2.6.12,
> >
> > Several weeks away?
>
> Hope so. We lost a lot of testing due to lack of daily
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 03:34, Andrew Morton wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Actually remove elf.h in the tree. The previous patch, due to a quilt
> > bug/misuse, left it in the tree as a 0-length file, preventing the build
> > to see it as missing and to generate a symlink in its place.
Ok,
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm, that's exciting. How to tell diff and patch to remove a zero-length
> file?
$ md a b c
$ touch a/a
$ echo .>c/a
$ diff -purN a c
diff -purN a/a c/a
--- a/a 2005-05-10 04:08:14.0 +0200
+++ c/a 2005-05-10 04:09:17.972505331 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1 @
18 matches
Mail list logo
