[uml-devel] [patch] x11 framebuffer driver

2005-05-27 Thread Gerd Knorr
Hi, > > btw: I'll have some x11-fb changes in the queue, so there will > > be at least one more patchkit. The patch need some more work > > though. I'll want to have the x11-fb patch ready for submit > > soon, so I can push it mainline for 2.6.13. Uploaded to http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/uml/p

RE: [uml-devel] Kernel panic with 2.6.11.6

2005-05-27 Thread Anthony Brock
Blaisor, I've been testing your 2.6.11.8-bs5 release applied to a 2.6.11.10 source tree. So far (3 days), it fixes the problem with kernel panics! Did I miss a message from you concerning this? Or is this an "accidental" fix to the console issues I've been having? In any case, thanks! Tony > -

[uml-devel] Re: [patch 4/8] irq code: Add coherence test for PREEMPT_ACTIVE

2005-05-27 Thread David Howells
Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, a grep shows that possible culprits (i.e. giving success to > grep GENERIC_HARDIRQS arch/*/Kconfig, and using 0x400 as PREEMPT_ACTIVE, > as given by grep PREEMPT_ACTIVE include/asm-*/thread_info.h) are (at a first > glance): frv, sh, sh64. For F