> "Paolo" == Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paolo> There were some problems about TT mode which appeared unsolvable
Paolo> on newer distros, and that was a reason to drop TT mode, but I
Paolo> just solved them, so there's no hurry in dropping it.
Good. I find that it
From: Christophe Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
printk() calls should include appropriate KERN_* constant.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/mconsole_kern.c |2 +-
kernel/exitcode.c |2 +-
kernel/process_ker
On Thursday 14 July 2005 13:16, Rob Landley wrote:
> Bodo's patch seems to have fixed the problem (albeit in a way that reveals
> ubuntu is using thread-local storage, so I can't use it anyway).
Hang on a sec, if TLS is screwing up -skas0, then why does -tt mode work?
Is this expected?
Rob
---
On Thursday 14 July 2005 14:57, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Thursday 14 July 2005 03:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
> > Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTEC
On Thursday 14 July 2005 03:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
> Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-14 01:11 PDT
> --- UML patch 2.6.12-bs5 also worked
On Thursday 14 July 2005 09:23, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:11:14PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> > Do you know _what_ makes the problem happen? Is it depended on the
> > compiler version (gcc 3.3.5) or is there any CONFIG_X, that lets
> > make use some special compiler optio
On Thursday 14 July 2005 07:37, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:02:46PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > There's only one pid, the ./linux process gdb fired off.
>
> No, there's the pid that's being ptraced, and I need the maps for it.
>
> > The breakpoint you
> > mentioned was accepted
On Thursday 14 July 2005 07:05, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> > stub_segv_handler misses the "push ebp" at the beginning. As you
> > do the normally corresponding "pop eax" explicitly, I think stack
> > pointer is wrong on call of sigreturn.
> >
> > I have no idea, what makes happ
On Thursday 14 July 2005 05:59, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> stub_segv_handler misses the "push ebp" at the beginning. As you
> do the normally corresponding "pop eax" explicitly, I think stack
> pointer is wrong on call of sigreturn.
>
> I have no idea, what makes happen this. Maybe it dep
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:11:14PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> Do you know _what_ makes the problem happen? Is it depended on the
> compiler version (gcc 3.3.5) or is there any CONFIG_X, that lets
> make use some special compiler option?
CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER (or maybe CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO enab
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:59:39PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> stub_segv_handler misses the "push ebp" at the beginning. As you
> do the normally corresponding "pop eax" explicitly, I think stack
> pointer is wrong on call of sigreturn.
>
> I have no idea, what makes happen this. Maybe it depen
Jeff Dike wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:05:11PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
I hope, the attached patch fixes the problem. The patch is tested in
my 2.6.12-rc4 + skas0, where I didn't see the problem. It still works
fine for me.
You're too quick for me sometimes :-) I was just about to
Jeff Dike wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:05:11PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
I hope, the attached patch fixes the problem. The patch is tested in
my 2.6.12-rc4 + skas0, where I didn't see the problem. It still works
fine for me.
You're too quick for me sometimes :-) I was just about to
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:05:11PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> I hope, the attached patch fixes the problem. The patch is tested in
> my 2.6.12-rc4 + skas0, where I didn't see the problem. It still works
> fine for me.
You're too quick for me sometimes :-) I was just about to write up
somethin
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:02:46PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> There's only one pid, the ./linux process gdb fired off.
No, there's the pid that's being ptraced, and I need the maps for it.
> The breakpoint you
> mentioned was accepted (it said breakpoint set and gave me an address), but
> it
Bodo Stroesser wrote:
stub_segv_handler misses the "push ebp" at the beginning. As you
do the normally corresponding "pop eax" explicitly, I think stack
pointer is wrong on call of sigreturn.
I have no idea, what makes happen this. Maybe it depends on compiler
version?
I hope, the attached pa
Rob Landley wrote:
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 07:11, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
Am I doing it right? Is there anything I can do to help track this down?
Rob
The value of EIP reported in your earlier mail is quite surprising.
Could you please "objdump" vmlinux and send the par
I just tried 2.6.12.2 with skas-V8.2. The server (otherwise reliable),
had a kernel crash (which I was unable to capture) within a couple of
hours of boot up.
Regards, Peter
Blaisorblade wrote:
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 00:26, Peter wrote:
Nothing in the logs prior to the first error message
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-14 01:40 PDT ---
> Yes, and -r1 should include -bs5 already... Bye
nice! bye
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.g
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-14 01:39 PDT ---
Yes, and -r1 should include -bs5 already... Bye
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.gentoo.org/userp
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-14 01:12 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=63369)
--> (http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=63369&action=view)
use
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-14 01:11 PDT ---
UML patch 2.6.12-bs5 also worked with usermode-sources-2.6.12
(that includes the gentoo patchset)
-
22 matches
Mail list logo
