Re: [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] Hardware Requirements -Some Questions about UML by a Newbie

2005-08-30 Thread Antoine Martin
Thanks Jeff, Works for me (tm) I reckon that this patch is small enough to go into 2.6.13.1 It fixes a bug, so it should be included, right? There are still problems that I can't track down. On occasion I ended up with a system hosed up, where I couldn't even do a 'ps -ef' without hanging the ter

[uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/9] UML - Mark SMP on UML/x86_64 as broken

2005-08-30 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:42:15PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > The generic one should work too, it's just less efficient. > So you can probably easily replace them. Yup, just something that hasn't been done yet. Jeff ---

[uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/9] UML - Mark SMP on UML/x86_64 as broken

2005-08-30 Thread Andi Kleen
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Noticed by Al Viro - SMP on x86_64 is fundamentally broken due to > UML's reuse of the host arch's percpu stuff. This is OK on x86, but > the x86_64 pda stuff just won't work for UML. The generic one should work too, it's just less efficient. So you can pr