Jeff Dike wrote:
I've put my FC4 image online at
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~jdike/root_fs.2005062201.bz2
It requires my full patchset in order to boot, especially the NPTL patches,
which, aside from some obvious nastinesses, seem to work.
As of today, it's fully updated,
Thanks to Bill
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 06:27:23PM -0800, Ram Pai wrote:
> Where can I find the nptl patches? Looked around in the uml website.
> Could not find anything matching.
http://user-mode-linux.sf.net/patches.html, the tls sequence towards the
end, from uml-add-tls-support to undo-empty.
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 16:09, Jeff Dike wrote:
> I've put my FC4 image online at
> http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~jdike/root_fs.2005062201.bz2
>
> It requires my full patchset in order to boot, especially the NPTL patches,
> which, aside from some obvious nastinesses, seem to work.
Where c
On Monday 14 November 2005 19:38, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:45:44PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > The breakage, by the way, (which occurs when you fix the failing hunk #2
> > up by hand) stems from the inability to find asm/signal.h:
>
> What distro is this? asm/signal is in gl
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:45:44PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> The breakage, by the way, (which occurs when you fix the failing hunk #2 up
> by
> hand) stems from the inability to find asm/signal.h:
What distro is this? asm/signal is in glibc-kernheaders here:
% rpm -q -f /usr/include/asm/sign
On Monday 14 November 2005 17:24, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Monday 14 November 2005 15:55, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 05:32:10PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > moan moan
>
> And proud of it!
>
> > Can you try the x86-64-clobbers-rcx patch below?
>
> Sure. (Rummages...)
>
> > If yo
On Monday 14 November 2005 15:55, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 05:32:10PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > moan moan
And proud of it!
> Can you try the x86-64-clobbers-rcx patch below?
Sure. (Rummages...)
> If you don't have it already, apply the fix-x86-stubs patch first.
It said
I've put my FC4 image online at
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~jdike/root_fs.2005062201.bz2
It requires my full patchset in order to boot, especially the NPTL patches,
which, aside from some obvious nastinesses, seem to work.
As of today, it's fully updated,
Thanks to Bill Stearns for
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 05:32:10PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> moan moan
Can you try the x86-64-clobbers-rcx patch below?
If you don't have it already, apply the fix-x86-stubs patch first.
Paolo, could you eyeball this one for me? This applies the stub_syscall*
goodness to stub_segv.c.
On Friday 11 November 2005 21:49, Antoine Martin wrote:
> > However, I just remembered I have an Ubuntu with GCC 4.0... so I could
> > test the thing.
> Or you could use a gentoo chroot. (if you leave it to build overnight..)
I have Gentoo installed, no problem... it's that actually they don't sup
On Monday 14 November 2005 00:26, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Sunday 13 November 2005 11:54, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 November 2005 02:36, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > I needed to patch two things to get 2.6.15-rc1 to build on an x86-64
> > > system running PLD linux:
> > >
> > > diff -ru linux
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Nix wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] moaned:
> > On Monday 14 November 2005 14:59, Nix wrote:
> >> I've long wanted to do the same sort of thing,
> >> the kernel keeps
> >> processing network packets and firewalling and bridging them perfectly
> >> well, but att
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] moaned:
> On Monday 14 November 2005 14:59, Nix wrote:
>> I've long wanted to do the same sort of thing,
>
> I guess you would like to run userspace processes or at least to call libUML
> to configure something (but I don't think you can ask a kernel to do s
On Monday 14 November 2005 14:59, Nix wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Jeff Dike prattled cheerily:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 01:09:06AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> >> > So I don't care about systemcall interception or anything like that,
> >>
> >> *blink* *blink*
> >>
> >> Ok, you want user mode li
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 05:32:10PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Sunday 13 November 2005 13:20, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 November 2005 20:32, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:36:41PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > > Stub registers -
> > > > 0 - 909090909090909
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Jeff Dike prattled cheerily:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 01:09:06AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
>> > So I don't care about systemcall interception or anything like that,
>>
>> *blink* *blink*
>>
>> Ok, you want user mode linux, but you don't want it to actually run user
>> proce
16 matches
Mail list logo
