-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Running a kernel which is not 2.6.15-rc2 (but a couple of merges back,
looking for a place where it works), I get:
Initializing software serial port version 1
Failed to open 'root_fs', errno = 2
RAMDISK: cramfs filesystem found at block 0
RAMDISK: L
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:41:26AM +, Antoine Martin wrote:
> * The same kernel compiled here using hardened GCC:
> gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (Gentoo Hardened 3.4.4-r1, HTB-3.4.4-1.00, ssp-3.4.4-1.0,
> pie-8.7.8)
> gives the same error reported earlier for x86 guests:
> the guest exits after spinning fo
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 11:35:14PM +, Antoine Martin wrote:
> [42951313.91] Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel mode signal 7
Did your /tmp fill up?
> * Now, with 2.6.15-rc3 it does not boot:
> * or in skas0 mode:
> Checking PROT_EXEC mmap in /tmp...OK
> Checking for the skas3 patch in the
This was a lot quicker than testing x86 guests...
(and solved some x86 questions I had too)
* 2.6.14-bs2 from Blaisorblade's site:
- in skas0 mode:
Does not show anything after:
"VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly."
And 2 processes eat up all the CPU (until I savagely kill them).
- in TT
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 15:00, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Any fix for the GCC errors on arch/um/include/sysdep/stub.h would be
> much appreciated (I have to compile on these hosts to be able to use the
> pcap network driver):
> CC arch/um/kernel/skas/clone.o
> arch/um/kernel/skas/clone.c: I
All of this testing was done on an amd64 host.
* With a 2.6.15-rc1 (+ 17-11-2005 patches from UML site) in skas0 mode:
Runs quite well, but when running some long compilation (php, gcc or
xorg for example) it ends up crashing (this not new to this version - I
believe this bug has been present for
> > Is NPTL supported and working? Are there separate patches to be
> applied
> > against 2.6.10 kernel?
>
> My current patchset, against 2.5.15-rc1, is running current Debian and
> FC4
> filesystems without any apparent problems.
>
> Jeff
I thought that last time
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 10:08, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Monday 28 November 2005 02:07, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Sunday 27 November 2005 12:31, Nix wrote:
> >
> > Did you catch Linus's long rant about how MAP_PRIVATE is deeply stupid
> > and that Linux will never really implement it?
>
> What's
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 05:28:56PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> So, again: can we finally rewrite clone.c in assembly? Or, otherwise, to use
> a
> unique assembly macro joining mmap, the return and trap_myself?
I would favor the second, although I would just join the mmap and storing of
the err
On Monday 28 November 2005 22:47, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Monday 28 November 2005 13:27, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:52:15AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> Inline is linux-kernel policy, but here the darn thing is as an attachment
On Sunday 27 November 2005 22:41, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Sunday 27 November 2005 13:20, Blaisorblade wrote:
> *shrug* The same argument could be made about any other argument that
> mount interprets. (Currently: loop, defaults, noauto, ro, rw, nosuid,
> suid, dev, nodev, exec, noexec, sync, asy
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 13:22, Phill Wombat wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> x86_64 binary.
>
> So far so good!
Thanks, I have no 64-bit FS to test it. Btw, there's also some other site with
binaries:
http://uml.harlowhill.com/index.php/PrecompiledKernels
http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/
> I have managed t
On Monday 28 November 2005 05:23, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 09:59:37PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > The attached patch is a (hacky) proposal, alternative to Jeff's
> > fix-stub-syscall6, to fix the SKAS0 compilation problem.
> Bleah :-)
Yep :-).
> > In fact, Jeff's patch makes
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 11:52, Nix wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Rob Landley prattled cheerily:
> > If you're using udev, then /dev is tmpfs. So /dev/shm is trivially
> > tmpfs.
> True enough;
configurable on Gentoo - you can now specify a full mount line in /etc/fstab,
and before you had an
On Monday 28 November 2005 02:07, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Sunday 27 November 2005 12:31, Nix wrote:
> Did you catch Linus's long rant about how MAP_PRIVATE is deeply stupid and
> that Linux will never really implement it?
What's that?
> And you can fsync and do stuff like journaling within a fil
Hi Paolo,
x86_64 binary.
So far so good!
I have managed to create an FC4/x86_64 rootfs from the very impressive
(and amazingly simple) shell script on umlwiki where the entire distro
is installed via yum. Had some trouble with gpg keys though.
The rootfs starts up and hangs at the usual places
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 04:52, Nix wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Rob Landley prattled cheerily:
> > If you're using udev, then /dev is tmpfs. So /dev/shm is trivially
> > tmpfs.
>
> True enough; but some people mount /dev with a size of 0.
That stopped working in 2.6.14. Now size=0 specifies
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Rob Landley prattled cheerily:
> If you're using udev, then /dev is tmpfs. So /dev/shm is trivially tmpfs.
True enough; but some people mount /dev with a size of 0. (Admittedly if
they don't want to break POSIX shm they'd better damn well mount *another*
tmpfs on /dev/shm wit
18 matches
Mail list logo
