On Monday 06 March 2006 20:33, Anthony Brock wrote:
> > On Monday 06 March 2006 9:11, Blaisorblade wrote:
> >
> > On Monday 27 February 2006 17:27, Anthony Brock wrote:
> > > In the mean time, we've experienced a second crash with the
> > > 2.6.15.1-bs1 kernel. It looks to be very similar to the pr
Slab corruption: start=0922713c, len=512
Redzone: 0x5a2cf071/0x5a2cf071.
Last user: [<080b57ba>](free_pipe_info+0x3e/0x58)
160: 00 4e 68 08 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b
Next obj: start=09227348, len=512
Redzone: 0x170fc2a5/0x170fc2a5.
Last user: [<080b57f2>](pipe_new+0x1e/0x64)
000: 18 10 17
On Monday 06 March 2006 9:11, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Monday 27 February 2006 17:27, Anthony Brock wrote:
> In the mean time, we've experienced a second crash with the
> 2.6.15.1-bs1 kernel. It looks to be very similar to the previous crash.
> Only, in this case, I issued the command "uml_mconsole
I've been seeing MM red zone messages on 2.6.16-fc3 with Jeff's patchset
from a couple of weeks ago. I haven't reported them since that's a
pretty old version by now. Should I post the next bunch I see?
-- John
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Monday 27 February 2006 17:27, Anthony Brock wrote:
> Sorry for taking so long to get back on this. We've been busy with some
> other issues. Some comments are inline below in addition to the output
> from a new crash.
> In the mean time, we've experienced a second crash with the
> 2.6.15.1-bs1
