[uml-devel] [PATCH] Fix UML build on i386 Ubuntu Dapper

2006-06-26 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
Hi Jeff, I run an x86_64 kernel with i386 userspace (Ubuntu Dapper) and decided to try out UML today. I found that UML wasn't quite aware of biarch compilers (which Ubuntu i386 ships). A fix similar to what was done for x86_64 should probably be committed (see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux

Re: [uml-devel] problems compiling 2.6.17 against glibc 2.4

2006-06-26 Thread Nix
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ok, I missed one important bit of info. Plus, MARC archives when searching > for > author don't support restricting to one ML. So, here's the link to the > discussion within UML-devel. Which is just a pointer to the issue (he surely > doesn't expl

Re: [uml-devel] problems compiling 2.6.17 against glibc 2.4

2006-06-26 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 26 June 2006 18:26, Nix wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: > > On Sunday 25 June 2006 21:19, Nix wrote: > >> On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] announced authoritatively: > >> > On Wednesday 21 June 2006 21:38, Nix wrote: > >> > >> [jmp_buf goes hidden] > >> > >> >

Re: [uml-devel] problems compiling 2.6.17 against glibc 2.4

2006-06-26 Thread Nix
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: > On Sunday 25 June 2006 21:19, Nix wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] announced authoritatively: >> > On Wednesday 21 June 2006 21:38, Nix wrote: >> >> [jmp_buf goes hidden] > >> > I made the same thought, but no, they have *already* cha

Re: [uml-devel] problems compiling 2.6.17 against glibc 2.4

2006-06-26 Thread Blaisorblade
On Sunday 25 June 2006 21:19, Nix wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] announced authoritatively: > > On Wednesday 21 June 2006 21:38, Nix wrote: > > [jmp_buf goes hidden] > > I made the same thought, but no, they have *already* changed it. > > Search for the message from Ulrich Drepper