Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> + err = request_irq(TIMER_IRQ, um_timer, SA_INTERRUPT, "timer", NULL);
SA_INTERRUPT is deprecated - I'll change this to IRQF_DISABLED.
We have a compatibility layer for now, but we need to start getting used to
using INTF_*.
Using Tomcat but need to d
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was looking at the code of the UML and more precisely at the functions
> set_task_sizes_tt and set_task_sizes_skas. I noticed that these 2
> functions take a paramater (arg) which is not used : the function is
> always called with the value 0.
>
> I suppo
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:07:25AM -0700, Brock, Anthony - NET wrote:
> What is the recommended means for verifying that a UML process is
> running?
Depends on what level of "running" you want to check for. Ping will
tell you if the kernel can respond to interrupts. mconsole version
(now) will t
> -Original Message-
> > Also, can this command still be used
> > to "wake up" a UML process? Is this still the recommended means for
> > verifying that a UML process if running?
>
> No, and no.
What is the recommended means for verifying that a UML process is
running?
Tony
Using Tomca
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:31:50AM -0700, Brock, Anthony - NET wrote:
> I'm running UML on an SMP machine, but have never encountered the "hang"
> issue. Is this text still accurate?
No, it's ancient history. No one ever figured out what the problem was,
but it hasn't been seen in ages.
> Also,
So what impact does this have on the following quote from
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/mconsole.html :
It's a simple no-op which can be used to check that a UML is running.
It's also a way of sending an interrupt to the UML. This is sometimes
useful on SMP hosts, where there's a bug whi
