Re: [uml-devel] Strange behaviour in eth assignments

2006-08-20 Thread alessandro salvatori
On 8/20/06, Peter Hovorka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > Yes, Sir. > > > > I didn't want to be rude, sorry. > > Oh no - I guess I should have attached some kind of smiley there, I > didn't think of you as rude. It's quite contrary: I'm very glad that > you do all this work! So don't mind!

Re: [uml-devel] Strange behaviour in eth assignments

2006-08-20 Thread Peter Hovorka
Hi, > > Yes, Sir. > > I didn't want to be rude, sorry. Oh no - I guess I should have attached some kind of smiley there, I didn't think of you as rude. It's quite contrary: I'm very glad that you do all this work! So don't mind! > I was just surprised, and one of my thoughts was "it is barfing

Re: [uml-devel] Strange behaviour in eth assignments

2006-08-20 Thread Blaisorblade
On Saturday 19 August 2006 18:38, Peter Hovorka wrote: > Hi, > > > > ./um2.6.16.27-bb1 ubd0=root_fs ubd1=swap_fs eth0=tuntap,tap112 > > > > Do you really mean "tap112"? > > Yes, Sir. I didn't want to be rude, sorry. > > Nobody I think tried this. > I've checked > > for bugs in parsing, but there i

Re: [uml-devel] Strange behaviour in eth assignments

2006-08-20 Thread Blaisorblade
On Sunday 20 August 2006 02:42, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 04:53:43PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > Do you really mean "tap112"? Nobody I think tried this. > > I have :-) I forgot! > Read The Book (and BTW, I need to figure out a way to get you > a copy). I reviewed it at the tim