Again, about 4 month since last time (for lack of time) I'm sending for final
review and for inclusion into -mm protection support for remap_file_pages (in
short "RFP prot support"), i.e. setting per-pte protections (beyond file
offset) through this syscall.
Since last release, I've changed the
On Saturday 26 August 2006 15:53, Dalibor Dukic wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 15:19 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Saturday 26 August 2006 14:11, Mathew Brown wrote:
> > > On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:07:59 +0200, "Blaisorblade"
> > >
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > > On Saturday 26 August 2006
On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 15:19 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Saturday 26 August 2006 14:11, Mathew Brown wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:07:59 +0200, "Blaisorblade"
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > On Saturday 26 August 2006 12:41, Mathew Brown wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:47:38 +0
On Saturday 26 August 2006 14:11, Mathew Brown wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:07:59 +0200, "Blaisorblade"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On Saturday 26 August 2006 12:41, Mathew Brown wrote:
> > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:47:38 +0200, "Dalibor Dukic"
> > >
> > > I mentioned this in my previous th
On Saturday 26 August 2006 14:35, Peter Hovorka wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> my sincere apologies to all of you for bothering about the Ubuntu eth
> problem.
Thanks for your apologies but thanks anyway for your competent cooperation.
> After talking to the ubuntu team we found out that the ubuntu
> in
Hi there,
my sincere apologies to all of you for bothering about the Ubuntu eth
problem. After talking to the ubuntu team we found out that the ubuntu
installer makes some entries in /etc/iftab to help udev whilst booting
the system. There were the two entries from the host system with eth0
an
On Monday 21 August 2006 23:56, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> arch/um/sys-i386/setjmp.S contains two #ifdef _REGPARM's.
>
> Even if regparm was used in i386 uml (which isn't currently done (why?)),
> I don't see _REGPARM being defined anywhere.
>
> Is this a bug waiting for happening when regparm will be us
I was thinking to some possible (theoretical?) troubles which could happen
with UML running on a SMP host - they're due to the code assuming it is
running on an UP machine.
1) Over the host we use pipes as synchronization mechanism. Who on the heart
assures the "memory barrier" guarantees a loc
